Three-Dimensional Limit-Equilibrium Comparison and Anchorage Design of a Multi-Plane Potentially Unstable Rock Block on a Hydropower Station Slope

Accurate stability assessment of potentially unstable rock blocks is essential for the safe construction and operation of hydropower infrastructure. This study applies a comparative limit-equilibrium workflow to a single, well-characterized sliding-type rock block (156.7 m3) bounded by three discontinuities (J1 250°/35°, J2 305°/75°, J3 215°/80°) on a hydropower station slope; discontinuity attitudes were measured with a geological compass and a terrestrial three-dimensional laser scanner, and the slope surface was reconstructed by UAV photogrammetry. A common, fully documented parameter set is used by a conventional two-dimensional method, a block-dividing limit-equilibrium method, and a three-dimensional residual-thrust method with moment equilibrium. With the site-suggested shear strengths and the lower-bound cohesion as the representative value, the block-dividing method gives factors of safety of 1.169, 1.063 and 0.903 under natural, heavy-rainfall and seismic conditions at optimal azimuths of 265.8°, 266.3° and 269.1°; the corresponding two-dimensional values are 1.037, 0.904 and 0.729, and the residual-thrust values are 1.497, 1.324 and 1.049. The block-dividing factors are 12.7–23.9% above the two-dimensional profile, whereas the residual-thrust result lies a further 16–28% higher (44–47% above the two-dimensional profile); this over-estimate is traced to the steep (75°, 80°) lateral release planes and to a mesh- and lambda-sensitive column solution, and is therefore non-conservative. A cohesion sensitivity analysis with fixed friction angle shows that the factor varies by 51–57% across the suggested cohesion interval. Under code-specified targets of 1.30/1.20/1.05, horizontal anchorage requires 366/427/566 kN versus 1150/1470/1413 kN for a perpendicular-to-slope layout, so a horizontal scheme of about 0.6 MN is adopted. Finite-element validation and field piezometric/displacement monitoring data, unavailable for this block, are identified as required future work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16189213
Primary Topic
Dam Engineering and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Three-Dimensional Limit-Equilibrium Comparison and Anchorage Design of a Multi-Plane Potentially Unstable Rock Block on a Hydropower Station Slope

徐敬武, Congyan Ran, Deng Weidong, Shishu Zhang et al.
Applied Sciences
Dam Engineering and Safety
article

Three-Dimensional Limit-Equilibrium Comparison and Anchorage Design of a Multi-Plane Potentially Unstable Rock Block on a Hydropower Station Slope

徐敬武, Congyan Ran, Deng Weidong, Shishu Zhang, Zhijie Mai, Shan Dong
article en

Abstract

Accurate stability assessment of potentially unstable rock blocks is essential for the safe construction and operation of hydropower infrastructure. This study applies a comparative limit-equilibrium workflow to a single, well-characterized sliding-type rock block (156.7 m3) bounded by three discontinuities (J1 250°/35°, J2 305°/75°, J3 215°/80°) on a hydropower station slope; discontinuity attitudes were measured with a geological compass and a terrestrial three-dimensional laser scanner, and the slope surface was reconstructed by UAV photogrammetry. A common, fully documented parameter set is used by a conventional two-dimensional method, a block-dividing limit-equilibrium method, and a three-dimensional residual-thrust method with moment equilibrium. With the site-suggested shear strengths and the lower-bound cohesion as the representative value, the block-dividing method gives factors of safety of 1.169, 1.063 and 0.903 under natural, heavy-rainfall and seismic conditions at optimal azimuths of 265.8°, 266.3° and 269.1°; the corresponding two-dimensional values are 1.037, 0.904 and 0.729, and the residual-thrust values are 1.497, 1.324 and 1.049. The block-dividing factors are 12.7–23.9% above the two-dimensional profile, whereas the residual-thrust result lies a further 16–28% higher (44–47% above the two-dimensional profile); this over-estimate is traced to the steep (75°, 80°) lateral release planes and to a mesh- and lambda-sensitive column solution, and is therefore non-conservative. A cohesion sensitivity analysis with fixed friction angle shows that the factor varies by 51–57% across the suggested cohesion interval. Under code-specified targets of 1.30/1.20/1.05, horizontal anchorage requires 366/427/566 kN versus 1150/1470/1413 kN for a perpendicular-to-slope layout, so a horizontal scheme of about 0.6 MN is adopted. Finite-element validation and field piezometric/displacement monitoring data, unavailable for this block, are identified as required future work.

Applied SciencesVol. 16(18)
China University of Geosciences (CN), PowerChina (China) (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Dam Engineering and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.