Functionality and Efficiency of AI-Based Learning through Design Thinking in Engineering Disciplines: An Empirical Analysis

This study examines the functionality and efficiency of AI-based learning implemented through the design thinking method within the context of engineering disciplines. In the wake of increasing digitalization and the integration of artificial intelligence in education, there is a growing need to evaluate the impact of such pedagogical models on the educational process and student development. The empirical study was conducted over two academic years among 64 engineering students, organized into teams and engaged in developing cyber-physical systems to solve real-world problems. The evaluation is based on four key areas: educational efficiency, creativity and design thinking, technological functionality, and educational experience and student impact. Data were collected through exploratory observation and analyzed using a system of indicators with a quantitative scale. The results of the study confirm that the integration of AI and design thinking creates an effective educational environment that supports the development of key engineering competencies and fosters active, engaged, and practice-oriented learning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTER RESEARCH
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37394/232018.2026.14.47
Primary Topic
Design Education and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Functionality and Efficiency of AI-Based Learning through Design Thinking in Engineering Disciplines: An Empirical Analysis

Maya Stoeva, Petko Stoev, Vladimir Ivanov, Stoyko Krastev
WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTER RESEARCH
Design Education and Practice
article

Functionality and Efficiency of AI-Based Learning through Design Thinking in Engineering Disciplines: An Empirical Analysis

Maya Stoeva, Petko Stoev, Vladimir Ivanov, Stoyko Krastev
article en

Abstract

This study examines the functionality and efficiency of AI-based learning implemented through the design thinking method within the context of engineering disciplines. In the wake of increasing digitalization and the integration of artificial intelligence in education, there is a growing need to evaluate the impact of such pedagogical models on the educational process and student development. The empirical study was conducted over two academic years among 64 engineering students, organized into teams and engaged in developing cyber-physical systems to solve real-world problems. The evaluation is based on four key areas: educational efficiency, creativity and design thinking, technological functionality, and educational experience and student impact. Data were collected through exploratory observation and analyzed using a system of indicators with a quantitative scale. The results of the study confirm that the integration of AI and design thinking creates an effective educational environment that supports the development of key engineering competencies and fosters active, engaged, and practice-oriented learning.

WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTER RESEARCHVol. 14
South-West University "Neofit Rilski" (BG), Bulgarian Academy of Sciences (BG), Institute of Information and Communication Technologies (BG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Design Education and Practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Functionality and Efficiency of AI-Based Learning through Design Thinking in Engineering Disciplines: An Empirical Analysis — Maya Stoeva, Petko Stoev, et al. · WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTER RESEARCH (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS