Intranasal Dexmedetomidine for Paediatric Procedural Sedation in the Emergency Department: A Single‐Centre Retrospective Observational Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES: To describe the use, effectiveness and safety of intranasal dexmedetomidine (IN DEX) for ED paediatric procedural sedation. METHOD: A retrospective cohort study was conducted over 7 months following implementation of an IN DEX guideline at Townsville University Hospital ED. Children aged 1-16 years were eligible if they received IN DEX. Outcomes of interest were sedation depth, ED length of stay (EDLOS), adverse events, procedural success and clinician/carer satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 114 patients were recruited. Median age was 3 years (IQR 2-5), 55.3% were male and 31.6% were Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander children. Median IN DEX dose was 3.11 mcg/kg (IQR 2.81-3.93). Common indications included peripheral intravenous cannulation (35.1%), laceration repair (21.1%), burns care (13.2%), foreign body removal (11.4%) and medical imaging (8.8%). Median EDLOS was 395 min (IQR 255-579). Sedation depth was moderate (mean University Michigan Sedation Scale score 2.1 (SD 0.9), a 0-4 scale on which higher scores indicate deeper sedation; documented for 90 of 114 sedations). IN DEX was successful as a sole sedative agent in 78.1% (95% CI 69.6%-84.7%) patients, ranging from 90.0% (9/10) for medical imaging to 53.8% (7/13) for foreign body removal. Adverse events occurred in 13.2% of patients (95% CI 8.1%-20.6%), predominantly mild bradycardia. Younger age was associated with higher success rates (aOR 0.86 per year, 95% CI 0.74-0.998). No dose-response relationship was identified. Clinicians (mean 4.3/5) and parents (mean 4.5/5) reported high satisfaction, although satisfaction was documented for fewer than half of sedations and significantly more often when sedation succeeded. CONCLUSION: In our single-centre study IN DEX is a well-tolerated, moderately effective and safe agent for ED paediatric procedural sedation with higher success rates in younger patients. Large, prospective, multisite studies are necessary to establish IN DEX's safety, effectiveness and predictors of success.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Emergency Medicine Australasia
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.70346
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Intranasal Dexmedetomidine for Paediatric Procedural Sedation in the Emergency Department: A Single‐Centre Retrospective Observational Cohort Study

Emma Whyte, Frances Snowden, Theophilus I. Emeto, Vinay Gangathimmaiah
Emergency Medicine Australasia
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
article

Intranasal Dexmedetomidine for Paediatric Procedural Sedation in the Emergency Department: A Single‐Centre Retrospective Observational Cohort Study

Emma Whyte, Frances Snowden, Theophilus I. Emeto, Vinay Gangathimmaiah
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe the use, effectiveness and safety of intranasal dexmedetomidine (IN DEX) for ED paediatric procedural sedation. METHOD: A retrospective cohort study was conducted over 7 months following implementation of an IN DEX guideline at Townsville University Hospital ED. Children aged 1-16 years were eligible if they received IN DEX. Outcomes of interest were sedation depth, ED length of stay (EDLOS), adverse events, procedural success and clinician/carer satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 114 patients were recruited. Median age was 3 years (IQR 2-5), 55.3% were male and 31.6% were Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander children. Median IN DEX dose was 3.11 mcg/kg (IQR 2.81-3.93). Common indications included peripheral intravenous cannulation (35.1%), laceration repair (21.1%), burns care (13.2%), foreign body removal (11.4%) and medical imaging (8.8%). Median EDLOS was 395 min (IQR 255-579). Sedation depth was moderate (mean University Michigan Sedation Scale score 2.1 (SD 0.9), a 0-4 scale on which higher scores indicate deeper sedation; documented for 90 of 114 sedations). IN DEX was successful as a sole sedative agent in 78.1% (95% CI 69.6%-84.7%) patients, ranging from 90.0% (9/10) for medical imaging to 53.8% (7/13) for foreign body removal. Adverse events occurred in 13.2% of patients (95% CI 8.1%-20.6%), predominantly mild bradycardia. Younger age was associated with higher success rates (aOR 0.86 per year, 95% CI 0.74-0.998). No dose-response relationship was identified. Clinicians (mean 4.3/5) and parents (mean 4.5/5) reported high satisfaction, although satisfaction was documented for fewer than half of sedations and significantly more often when sedation succeeded. CONCLUSION: In our single-centre study IN DEX is a well-tolerated, moderately effective and safe agent for ED paediatric procedural sedation with higher success rates in younger patients. Large, prospective, multisite studies are necessary to establish IN DEX's safety, effectiveness and predictors of success.

Emergency Medicine AustralasiaVol. 38(5)
Townsville Hospital (AU), James Cook University (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.