Modern Management of Inferior Vena Caval Injuries: What You Need to Know

ABSTRACT: Traumatic inferior vena cava (IVC) injuries are uncommon but remain among the most lethal injuries in abdominal vascular trauma, with mortality driven by shock, injury location, associated injuries, and loss of retroperitoneal tamponade. This review summarizes a physiology-first, segment-specific approach to adult traumatic IVC injuries. Initial management should prioritize the patient's hemodynamic status over radiologic diagnosis alone. Patients with persistent or recurrent hypotension, continued transfusion requirements, acidosis, or signs of ongoing intra-abdominal hemorrhage require immediate hemorrhage control with damage-control resuscitation. In stable or stabilized patients, contrast-enhanced computed tomography should determine whether bleeding is active or contained, whether hemorrhage is intraperitoneal or retroperitoneal, which IVC segment is involved, and whether associated injuries mandate laparotomy. Operative management relies on exposure, temporary control, definition of the venous defect, and the simplest durable repair compatible with physiology. Primary venorrhaphy is preferred when feasible, whereas ligation, patch repair, intraluminal balloon control, venovenous bypass, or staged damage-control strategies may be required in selected scenarios. Retrohepatic and suprahepatic injuries require early recognition, packing, and inflow control when right upper quadrant bleeding is present, and rapid mobilization of multidisciplinary resources if necessary. More recently, endovascular, hybrid, and nonoperative strategies have gained expanded roles but should be reserved for carefully selected stable or stabilized patients with suitable anatomy, contained bleeding, and in locations with immediate capability to convert to an open approach if physiology deteriorates. Postoperative care requires vigilance for recurrent bleeding, caval thrombosis, venous thromboembolism, renal or hepatic dysfunction, and complications related to ligation or reconstruction. Contemporary management of IVC injury is dynamic: physiology determines urgency, imaging defines anatomy in stable patients, and institutional capability determines the safest definitive strategy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0000000000005173
Primary Topic
Vascular Procedures and Complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Modern Management of Inferior Vena Caval Injuries: What You Need to Know

Junsik Kwon, Raúl Coimbra, Leslie Kobayashi
The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care
Vascular Procedures and Complications
article

Modern Management of Inferior Vena Caval Injuries: What You Need to Know

Junsik Kwon, Raúl Coimbra, Leslie Kobayashi
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Traumatic inferior vena cava (IVC) injuries are uncommon but remain among the most lethal injuries in abdominal vascular trauma, with mortality driven by shock, injury location, associated injuries, and loss of retroperitoneal tamponade. This review summarizes a physiology-first, segment-specific approach to adult traumatic IVC injuries. Initial management should prioritize the patient's hemodynamic status over radiologic diagnosis alone. Patients with persistent or recurrent hypotension, continued transfusion requirements, acidosis, or signs of ongoing intra-abdominal hemorrhage require immediate hemorrhage control with damage-control resuscitation. In stable or stabilized patients, contrast-enhanced computed tomography should determine whether bleeding is active or contained, whether hemorrhage is intraperitoneal or retroperitoneal, which IVC segment is involved, and whether associated injuries mandate laparotomy. Operative management relies on exposure, temporary control, definition of the venous defect, and the simplest durable repair compatible with physiology. Primary venorrhaphy is preferred when feasible, whereas ligation, patch repair, intraluminal balloon control, venovenous bypass, or staged damage-control strategies may be required in selected scenarios. Retrohepatic and suprahepatic injuries require early recognition, packing, and inflow control when right upper quadrant bleeding is present, and rapid mobilization of multidisciplinary resources if necessary. More recently, endovascular, hybrid, and nonoperative strategies have gained expanded roles but should be reserved for carefully selected stable or stabilized patients with suitable anatomy, contained bleeding, and in locations with immediate capability to convert to an open approach if physiology deteriorates. Postoperative care requires vigilance for recurrent bleeding, caval thrombosis, venous thromboembolism, renal or hepatic dysfunction, and complications related to ligation or reconstruction. Contemporary management of IVC injury is dynamic: physiology determines urgency, imaging defines anatomy in stable patients, and institutional capability determines the safest definitive strategy.

The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Vascular Procedures and Complications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.