Effect of Transverse Reinforcement Configuration on Fire Resistance of Circular CFST Columns

The use of concrete-filled steel tubular (CFST) columns has grown increasingly in the construction industry. In the present study, the effects of the configuration of transverse rebars, either circular (CFSTC) or spiral (CFSTS), on the behavior of CFST columns under fire conditions were investigated. A finite element (FE) model capable of tracing fire-induced temperatures and axial deformations was verified using experimental data from fire tests on RC columns. The effects of various parameters on the fire behavior of CFST columns, including the compressive strength of concrete, the yield strengths of steel tube and reinforcing bars, the concrete cover thickness, the load ratio, the cross-sectional dimension, the longitudinal reinforcement ratio, the steel tube ratio, and the spacing of circular stirrups, were herein discussed and clarified. The effects of the investigated parameters were evaluated in terms of fire resistance time under sustained axial loading. Increasing the concrete compressive strength, reinforcing bar strength, cross-sectional dimension, and longitudinal reinforcement ratio generally increased the fire resistance time, whereas the effect of concrete cover thickness was comparatively small. For example, at a load ratio of 0.6, increasing the concrete compressive strength from 20 to 50 MPa increased the fire resistance time by 25.6% and 13.2% for CFSTC and CFSTS columns, respectively. Conversely, increasing the steel tube yield strength from 235 to 420 MPa reduced the corresponding fire resistance times by 46.3% and 37.4%, respectively. The relative performances of the transverse reinforcement configurations were also load-dependent; under the reference conditions, CFSTC exhibited approximately 4.0% higher fire resistance at a load ratio of 0.4, whereas CFSTS exhibited approximately 7.0% higher fire resistance at a load ratio of 0.6.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16183706
Primary Topic
Fire effects on concrete materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Effect of Transverse Reinforcement Configuration on Fire Resistance of Circular CFST Columns

Venkatesh Kodur, Abbas Rezaeian, Majid Khayat, Mohammadreza Rabbani Nowruzani
Buildings
Fire effects on concrete materials
article

Effect of Transverse Reinforcement Configuration on Fire Resistance of Circular CFST Columns

Venkatesh Kodur, Abbas Rezaeian, Majid Khayat, Mohammadreza Rabbani Nowruzani
article en

Abstract

The use of concrete-filled steel tubular (CFST) columns has grown increasingly in the construction industry. In the present study, the effects of the configuration of transverse rebars, either circular (CFSTC) or spiral (CFSTS), on the behavior of CFST columns under fire conditions were investigated. A finite element (FE) model capable of tracing fire-induced temperatures and axial deformations was verified using experimental data from fire tests on RC columns. The effects of various parameters on the fire behavior of CFST columns, including the compressive strength of concrete, the yield strengths of steel tube and reinforcing bars, the concrete cover thickness, the load ratio, the cross-sectional dimension, the longitudinal reinforcement ratio, the steel tube ratio, and the spacing of circular stirrups, were herein discussed and clarified. The effects of the investigated parameters were evaluated in terms of fire resistance time under sustained axial loading. Increasing the concrete compressive strength, reinforcing bar strength, cross-sectional dimension, and longitudinal reinforcement ratio generally increased the fire resistance time, whereas the effect of concrete cover thickness was comparatively small. For example, at a load ratio of 0.6, increasing the concrete compressive strength from 20 to 50 MPa increased the fire resistance time by 25.6% and 13.2% for CFSTC and CFSTS columns, respectively. Conversely, increasing the steel tube yield strength from 235 to 420 MPa reduced the corresponding fire resistance times by 46.3% and 37.4%, respectively. The relative performances of the transverse reinforcement configurations were also load-dependent; under the reference conditions, CFSTC exhibited approximately 4.0% higher fire resistance at a load ratio of 0.4, whereas CFSTS exhibited approximately 7.0% higher fire resistance at a load ratio of 0.6.

BuildingsVol. 16(18)
Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz (IR), Michigan State University (US)
Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Fire effects on concrete materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.