Why am I (not) being targeted? Conceptualising the intersectional complexities of cancel culture and future research agenda

As cancel culture becomes more prevalent, inconsistencies emerge in the way cancellations manifest for different people. Yet the underlying reasons for this remain untheorised. The absence of a shared conceptualisation has created disagreement in cancel culture research, and while studies acknowledge an intersectional component, it remains underexplored. To address these gaps, we use a conceptual methodology, drawing on integrative literature review and theory synthesis to develop a conceptual framework detailing cancel culture across micro, meso, and macro levels, and identify all involved actors. Our framework illustrates how power dynamics and the severity of transgressions shape a target’s ability to resist cancellation. We find individuals with intersecting identities may face greater challenges in mobilising support, which impacts escalation and outcomes. We conclude by proposing future research directions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Marketing Management
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257x.2026.2733458
Primary Topic
Cultural Differences and Values
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Why am I (not) being targeted? Conceptualising the intersectional complexities of cancel culture and future research agenda

Alison M. Joubert, Sally Rao Hill, Amelie Burgess, Georgia Wastell
Journal of Marketing Management
Cultural Differences and Values
article

Why am I (not) being targeted? Conceptualising the intersectional complexities of cancel culture and future research agenda

Alison M. Joubert, Sally Rao Hill, Amelie Burgess, Georgia Wastell
article en

Abstract

As cancel culture becomes more prevalent, inconsistencies emerge in the way cancellations manifest for different people. Yet the underlying reasons for this remain untheorised. The absence of a shared conceptualisation has created disagreement in cancel culture research, and while studies acknowledge an intersectional component, it remains underexplored. To address these gaps, we use a conceptual methodology, drawing on integrative literature review and theory synthesis to develop a conceptual framework detailing cancel culture across micro, meso, and macro levels, and identify all involved actors. Our framework illustrates how power dynamics and the severity of transgressions shape a target’s ability to resist cancellation. We find individuals with intersecting identities may face greater challenges in mobilising support, which impacts escalation and outcomes. We conclude by proposing future research directions.

Journal of Marketing Management
The University of Adelaide (AU)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Cultural Differences and Values
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Why am I (not) being targeted? Conceptualising the intersectional complexities of cancel culture and future research agenda — Alison M. Joubert, Sally Rao Hill, et al. · Journal of Marketing Management (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS