Epidemiology of spinal fractures in polytrauma patients

PURPOSE: The epidemiology of spinal fractures in polytrauma, population characteristics and their hospital outcomes are not well defined. This study aimed to describe the epidemiology and outcomes of spinal fractures in a consensus defined polytrauma cohort. METHODS: A 13-year (2009-2021) retrospective study was conducted on Newcastle Definition based polytrauma patients at a Level-1 centre. Polytrauma patients were categorised based on the presence of vertebral fractures and compared in demographics, injury mechanism, injury severity and pattern, physiological parameters, treatment aspects, and outcomes. RESULTS: From the 1425 polytrauma patients, 632 (44.4%) sustained spinal fractures. These patients were older (48 vs. 38 years, p < 0.001) with identical injury severity (ISS = 29), were more frequently admitted (62.8% vs. 57.4%, p = 0.037) and also stayed longer in ICU (6 vs. 3 days, p < 0.001) and in hospital (14.5 vs. 12 days, p = 0.002). Mortality did not differ significantly (10.4% vs. 13.5%, p = 0.08). The lumbar spine was the most frequently fractured segment (7.3%), followed by thoracic (3.3%), cervical (3.3%) and sacral (3.1%) levels. Spinal cord injury occurred in 41 (6.5%) spinal fracture patients and was associated with a high ISS and prolonged hospitalisation [ISS:34(IQR 20.5); ICU LOS:10(IQR21.75); Hospital LOS:22(IQR41)]. Spinal fracture patients that classified as polytrauma irrespective of the presence of spinal fracture had a higher ISS (34 vs. 22, p < 0.001), ICU admission rate (75.8% vs. 26.1%, p < 0.001), longer hospital LOS (18 vs. 9 days, p < 0.001), higher mortality (12.4% vs. 4.9%, p = 0.001) and lower spinal cord injury rate (4.5% vs. 12.1%, p = 0.001) compared to those who qualified as polytrauma due to the presence of spinal fracture. The subset of spinal fracture patients presenting in traumatic shock had the highest median ISS, hospital resource utilisation and mortality rate. CONCLUSION: Spinal fractures occur in nearly half of the polytrauma patients and 18% of them have multiple vertebral body fractures. These patients are older with similar injury severity and mortality but require more hospital resource utilisation compared to polytrauma patients without spine fractures. The high-risk for mortality spine fracture patients are the ones presenting in shock, with spinal cord injury and those who would meet polytrauma criteria irrespective of the presence of spinal fracture.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-026-03318-x
Primary Topic
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Epidemiology of spinal fractures in polytrauma patients

Zsolt J. Balogh, Simone Meakes, Angela Fischer, Stephanus Jacobus Malan
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
article

Epidemiology of spinal fractures in polytrauma patients

Zsolt J. Balogh, Simone Meakes, Angela Fischer, Stephanus Jacobus Malan
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: The epidemiology of spinal fractures in polytrauma, population characteristics and their hospital outcomes are not well defined. This study aimed to describe the epidemiology and outcomes of spinal fractures in a consensus defined polytrauma cohort. METHODS: A 13-year (2009-2021) retrospective study was conducted on Newcastle Definition based polytrauma patients at a Level-1 centre. Polytrauma patients were categorised based on the presence of vertebral fractures and compared in demographics, injury mechanism, injury severity and pattern, physiological parameters, treatment aspects, and outcomes. RESULTS: From the 1425 polytrauma patients, 632 (44.4%) sustained spinal fractures. These patients were older (48 vs. 38 years, p < 0.001) with identical injury severity (ISS = 29), were more frequently admitted (62.8% vs. 57.4%, p = 0.037) and also stayed longer in ICU (6 vs. 3 days, p < 0.001) and in hospital (14.5 vs. 12 days, p = 0.002). Mortality did not differ significantly (10.4% vs. 13.5%, p = 0.08). The lumbar spine was the most frequently fractured segment (7.3%), followed by thoracic (3.3%), cervical (3.3%) and sacral (3.1%) levels. Spinal cord injury occurred in 41 (6.5%) spinal fracture patients and was associated with a high ISS and prolonged hospitalisation [ISS:34(IQR 20.5); ICU LOS:10(IQR21.75); Hospital LOS:22(IQR41)]. Spinal fracture patients that classified as polytrauma irrespective of the presence of spinal fracture had a higher ISS (34 vs. 22, p < 0.001), ICU admission rate (75.8% vs. 26.1%, p < 0.001), longer hospital LOS (18 vs. 9 days, p < 0.001), higher mortality (12.4% vs. 4.9%, p = 0.001) and lower spinal cord injury rate (4.5% vs. 12.1%, p = 0.001) compared to those who qualified as polytrauma due to the presence of spinal fracture. The subset of spinal fracture patients presenting in traumatic shock had the highest median ISS, hospital resource utilisation and mortality rate. CONCLUSION: Spinal fractures occur in nearly half of the polytrauma patients and 18% of them have multiple vertebral body fractures. These patients are older with similar injury severity and mortality but require more hospital resource utilisation compared to polytrauma patients without spine fractures. The high-risk for mortality spine fracture patients are the ones presenting in shock, with spinal cord injury and those who would meet polytrauma criteria irrespective of the presence of spinal fracture.

European Journal of Trauma and Emergency SurgeryVol. 52(1)
John Hunter Hospital (AU), Hunter Medical Research Institute (AU), Hunter New England Local Health District (AU), University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.