Comprehensive Mechanics-Based Metrics for Quantification of Head Impacts from Kinematics

Mechanics-based metrics derived from principles of mechanical power and energy offer a comprehensive approach to characterizing head acceleration events (HAEs) recorded by impact sensing devices. However, systematic evaluation of diverse metric formulations remains limited. The objective of this study was to establish and compare a comprehensive set of 40 mechanics-based metrics for characterizing HAEs, applied to low-severity soccer headers as a demonstration dataset. A custom instrumented mouthpiece system collected head kinematic data from 18 subjects across 308 headers. Exploratory unsupervised analyses were intended to characterize the internal structure of the metric space rather than establish predictive validity or generalizability beyond this dataset. Principal components analysis revealed three latent metric families (proportional, rotational, translational/combined), with mechanics-based metrics demonstrating stronger loadings on principal components compared to peak resultant kinematics alone, suggesting they capture additional dimensions of biomechanical variability within this metric space. K-means clustering identified four distinct kinematic impact profiles, demonstrating that meaningful biomechanical structure exists even within a homogeneous sample of low-severity impacts. A minimal reporting set spanning traditional peak metrics, one energy or power metric, and one proportional metric is recommended to facilitate cross-study comparisons. The forty metrics presented should not be interpreted as immediate improvements in injury prediction; but rather they may provide comprehensive and complementary biomechanical characterization that is useful for future analyses of exposure assessment, feature selection, and metric validation studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4072689
Primary Topic
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Comprehensive Mechanics-Based Metrics for Quantification of Head Impacts from Kinematics

Tanner M. Filben, Kristen F. Nicholson, Ty D. Holcomb, Jillian E. Urban et al.
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
article

Comprehensive Mechanics-Based Metrics for Quantification of Head Impacts from Kinematics

Tanner M. Filben, Kristen F. Nicholson, Ty D. Holcomb, Jillian E. Urban, Garrett S Bullock, Joel D Stitzel, Cole Smith, N Stewart Pritchard
article en

Abstract

Mechanics-based metrics derived from principles of mechanical power and energy offer a comprehensive approach to characterizing head acceleration events (HAEs) recorded by impact sensing devices. However, systematic evaluation of diverse metric formulations remains limited. The objective of this study was to establish and compare a comprehensive set of 40 mechanics-based metrics for characterizing HAEs, applied to low-severity soccer headers as a demonstration dataset. A custom instrumented mouthpiece system collected head kinematic data from 18 subjects across 308 headers. Exploratory unsupervised analyses were intended to characterize the internal structure of the metric space rather than establish predictive validity or generalizability beyond this dataset. Principal components analysis revealed three latent metric families (proportional, rotational, translational/combined), with mechanics-based metrics demonstrating stronger loadings on principal components compared to peak resultant kinematics alone, suggesting they capture additional dimensions of biomechanical variability within this metric space. K-means clustering identified four distinct kinematic impact profiles, demonstrating that meaningful biomechanical structure exists even within a homogeneous sample of low-severity impacts. A minimal reporting set spanning traditional peak metrics, one energy or power metric, and one proportional metric is recommended to facilitate cross-study comparisons. The forty metrics presented should not be interpreted as immediate improvements in injury prediction; but rather they may provide comprehensive and complementary biomechanical characterization that is useful for future analyses of exposure assessment, feature selection, and metric validation studies.

Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
Virginia Tech - Wake Forest University School of Biomedical Engineering & Sciences (US), Wake Forest University (US)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.