The National in the Triptych of Religion, Race and Caste: Kaye, Phule and Savarkar

This article contends that religion remained central to understanding ‘nationalism’ in Britain and India in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. This proposition will be demonstrated in concrete form through reading, and cross - reading, three interpretations of the Revolt of 1857: John Kaye’s A History of the Sepoy War in India 1857–58 (1880), Jyotirao Phule’s Slavery (1873) and Cultivator’s Whipcord (1883) and V.D. Savarkar’s The Indian War of Independence (1909). The interpretations of the rebellion as both religious and national enable one to focus the analysis of these categories, and their stakes, through a study of their institutional and social contexts. A critique is thereby established of an extant historiography which separates the global emergence of nationalism from questions of religious identity and abstracts religion from questions of material authority.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in People’s History
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23484489261480945
Primary Topic
Anthropological Studies and Insights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The National in the Triptych of Religion, Race and Caste: Kaye, Phule and Savarkar

Rahul Govind
Studies in People’s History
Anthropological Studies and Insights
article

The National in the Triptych of Religion, Race and Caste: Kaye, Phule and Savarkar

Rahul Govind
article en

Abstract

This article contends that religion remained central to understanding ‘nationalism’ in Britain and India in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. This proposition will be demonstrated in concrete form through reading, and cross - reading, three interpretations of the Revolt of 1857: John Kaye’s A History of the Sepoy War in India 1857–58 (1880), Jyotirao Phule’s Slavery (1873) and Cultivator’s Whipcord (1883) and V.D. Savarkar’s The Indian War of Independence (1909). The interpretations of the rebellion as both religious and national enable one to focus the analysis of these categories, and their stakes, through a study of their institutional and social contexts. A critique is thereby established of an extant historiography which separates the global emergence of nationalism from questions of religious identity and abstracts religion from questions of material authority.

Studies in People’s History
University of Delhi (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Anthropological Studies and Insights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The National in the Triptych of Religion, Race and Caste: Kaye, Phule and Savarkar — Rahul Govind · Studies in People’s History (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS