Voters’ perceptions of ideologically inconsistent parties

There is a growing consensus in party politics that new fault lines are emerging, and scholars increasingly characterise competition as multidimensional. In a multidimensional space, parties can adopt varied positions, combining left/progressive stances on some issues with right/conservative ones on others. Earlier work found that parties combining such positions – what this article refers to as ideological inconsistency – receive less support than ideologically consistent parties. Yet insights are lacking into why inconsistent parties receive lower support. To address this, this article uses original surveys in ten countries, asking respondents and experts to position parties on economic, social, and cultural issues. Results show that citizens are somewhat less informed about the positions of inconsistent parties. The article also finds that when citizens perceive a party as more inconsistent, they like it less. This effect is not explained by proximity considerations or party type, suggesting a general distaste for ideological inconsistency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
West European Politics
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2026.2725847
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Voters’ perceptions of ideologically inconsistent parties

Zeynep Somer‐Topcu, Ruth Dassonneville, Patrick Fournier
West European Politics
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

Voters’ perceptions of ideologically inconsistent parties

Zeynep Somer‐Topcu, Ruth Dassonneville, Patrick Fournier
article en

Abstract

There is a growing consensus in party politics that new fault lines are emerging, and scholars increasingly characterise competition as multidimensional. In a multidimensional space, parties can adopt varied positions, combining left/progressive stances on some issues with right/conservative ones on others. Earlier work found that parties combining such positions – what this article refers to as ideological inconsistency – receive less support than ideologically consistent parties. Yet insights are lacking into why inconsistent parties receive lower support. To address this, this article uses original surveys in ten countries, asking respondents and experts to position parties on economic, social, and cultural issues. Results show that citizens are somewhat less informed about the positions of inconsistent parties. The article also finds that when citizens perceive a party as more inconsistent, they like it less. This effect is not explained by proximity considerations or party type, suggesting a general distaste for ideological inconsistency.

West European Politics
Université de Montréal (CA), The University of Texas at Austin (US), KU Leuven (BE)
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Voters’ perceptions of ideologically inconsistent parties — Zeynep Somer‐Topcu, Ruth Dassonneville, et al. · West European Politics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS