Nonlinear Association of Length of Stay with In-Hospital Mortality in Alzheimer’s Disease Hospitalizations: Admission-Only vs. Inpatient-Course Prediction Using Explainable Machine Learning

Background: Hospitalizations among patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) carry substantial mortality risk, but length of stay (LOS) is time-dependent and may reflect heterogeneous inpatient trajectories. We examined unadjusted and adjusted LOS–mortality patterns and compared admission-only versus inpatient-course prediction using explainable machine learning. Methods: Using the full 2017 Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD), we identified hospitalizations among adults aged ≥60 years with an ICD-10-CM G30.x AD code in any diagnosis position. Records with missing in-hospital mortality status were excluded. LOS was summarized in clinically interpretable bins and modeled using restricted cubic splines. Model A excluded explicit inpatient-course measures, whereas Model B added LOS, procedure count, and total charges. Performance was evaluated using patient-grouped 5-fold out-of-fold validation and summarized by AUROC and AUPRC; SHAP was used for interpretation. Results: Among 249,507 AD hospitalizations, 12,666 in-hospital deaths occurred (5.08%; weighted mortality 4.97%). Unadjusted mortality was highest at LOS 0–1 day (13.00%), lowest at 4–6 days (3.47%), and increased to 7.77% at ≥22 days. After multivariable adjustment, LOS remained strongly nonlinear, but adjusted predicted mortality declined across the modeled LOS range. Model A achieved AUROC/AUPRC of 0.780/0.180, whereas Model B improved to 0.828/0.329. Sepsis, diagnostic burden, acute kidney injury, age, stroke, and pneumonia were stable predictors; LOS and procedure burden added prognostic information in Model B. Conclusions: The crude LOS–mortality pattern was U-shaped, whereas the adjusted pattern suggests that the late-stay increase in unadjusted mortality is partly explained by patient complexity and evolving inpatient-course factors. Admission-only prediction provides meaningful early risk stratification, while inpatient-course information improves prognostic assessment as hospitalization evolves.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geriatrics
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics11050136
Primary Topic
Frailty in Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Nonlinear Association of Length of Stay with In-Hospital Mortality in Alzheimer’s Disease Hospitalizations: Admission-Only vs. Inpatient-Course Prediction Using Explainable Machine Learning

Tursun Alkam, Ebrahim Tarshizi, Andrew H Van Benschoten
Geriatrics
Frailty in Older Adults
article

Nonlinear Association of Length of Stay with In-Hospital Mortality in Alzheimer’s Disease Hospitalizations: Admission-Only vs. Inpatient-Course Prediction Using Explainable Machine Learning

Tursun Alkam, Ebrahim Tarshizi, Andrew H Van Benschoten
article en

Abstract

Background: Hospitalizations among patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) carry substantial mortality risk, but length of stay (LOS) is time-dependent and may reflect heterogeneous inpatient trajectories. We examined unadjusted and adjusted LOS–mortality patterns and compared admission-only versus inpatient-course prediction using explainable machine learning. Methods: Using the full 2017 Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD), we identified hospitalizations among adults aged ≥60 years with an ICD-10-CM G30.x AD code in any diagnosis position. Records with missing in-hospital mortality status were excluded. LOS was summarized in clinically interpretable bins and modeled using restricted cubic splines. Model A excluded explicit inpatient-course measures, whereas Model B added LOS, procedure count, and total charges. Performance was evaluated using patient-grouped 5-fold out-of-fold validation and summarized by AUROC and AUPRC; SHAP was used for interpretation. Results: Among 249,507 AD hospitalizations, 12,666 in-hospital deaths occurred (5.08%; weighted mortality 4.97%). Unadjusted mortality was highest at LOS 0–1 day (13.00%), lowest at 4–6 days (3.47%), and increased to 7.77% at ≥22 days. After multivariable adjustment, LOS remained strongly nonlinear, but adjusted predicted mortality declined across the modeled LOS range. Model A achieved AUROC/AUPRC of 0.780/0.180, whereas Model B improved to 0.828/0.329. Sepsis, diagnostic burden, acute kidney injury, age, stroke, and pneumonia were stable predictors; LOS and procedure burden added prognostic information in Model B. Conclusions: The crude LOS–mortality pattern was U-shaped, whereas the adjusted pattern suggests that the late-stay increase in unadjusted mortality is partly explained by patient complexity and evolving inpatient-course factors. Admission-only prediction provides meaningful early risk stratification, while inpatient-course information improves prognostic assessment as hospitalization evolves.

GeriatricsVol. 11(5)
University of San Diego (US), University of California San Diego (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Frailty in Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.