EXPRESS: A CONFIGURATIONAL THEORY OF BUSINESS COLLECTIVE ACTION

Firms facing institutional pressures often respond collectively through established organizations such as trade associations. However, they may also create new organizations that supplement, redirect, or challenge these incumbent vehicles. Yet we know little about what shapes firms’ choice among these different forms of collective action. Adopting a configurational approach, we theorize how collective responses reorganize the set of organizational vehicles through which business interests are aggregated, represented, and coordinated in organizational fields – the BCA infrastructure. We identify critical contingencies related to institutional pressures, field structure, and existing BCA infrastructure, and we theorize how combinations of these contingencies generate four recurrent coordination problems––contribution problems, distributional conflict, capacity gaps, and representational authority problems––that give rise to distinct BCA infrastructure outcomes: consolidation around incumbent vehicles, complementation through new BCA vehicles offering functional differentiation, cooptation of existing vehicles, or competition via rival BCA vehicles. In doing so, we offer a conceptual lens for understanding the proliferation of business associations, coalitions, platforms, and initiatives across organizational fields.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Strategic Organization
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14761270261491704
Primary Topic
Management and Organizational Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

EXPRESS: A CONFIGURATIONAL THEORY OF BUSINESS COLLECTIVE ACTION

Jean‐Baptiste Litrico, José Carlos Marques, Jakomijn van Wijk
Strategic Organization
Management and Organizational Studies
article

EXPRESS: A CONFIGURATIONAL THEORY OF BUSINESS COLLECTIVE ACTION

Jean‐Baptiste Litrico, José Carlos Marques, Jakomijn van Wijk
article en

Abstract

Firms facing institutional pressures often respond collectively through established organizations such as trade associations. However, they may also create new organizations that supplement, redirect, or challenge these incumbent vehicles. Yet we know little about what shapes firms’ choice among these different forms of collective action. Adopting a configurational approach, we theorize how collective responses reorganize the set of organizational vehicles through which business interests are aggregated, represented, and coordinated in organizational fields – the BCA infrastructure. We identify critical contingencies related to institutional pressures, field structure, and existing BCA infrastructure, and we theorize how combinations of these contingencies generate four recurrent coordination problems––contribution problems, distributional conflict, capacity gaps, and representational authority problems––that give rise to distinct BCA infrastructure outcomes: consolidation around incumbent vehicles, complementation through new BCA vehicles offering functional differentiation, cooptation of existing vehicles, or competition via rival BCA vehicles. In doing so, we offer a conceptual lens for understanding the proliferation of business associations, coalitions, platforms, and initiatives across organizational fields.

Strategic Organization
University of Ottawa (CA), Queen's University (CA), Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (NL)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Management and Organizational Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.