Parliamentary Oversight of Public Values in the Digital Age: An Empirical Analysis of the Dutch Parliament

While there has been attention for government's role in protecting public values impacted by digital technologies, attention for the role of parliament remains limited. Yet, parliament is the primary place where debate about the impact of technologies on public values takes place and where options to regulate technology are considered. This study examines how Dutch Parliament has responded to the challenge of maintaining oversight of the digital transformation of society and safeguarding public values. Based on a qualitative multiple case study, we demonstrate that parliamentary oversight included the majority of public values impacted by digitalization, but not in a timely and comprehensive way. Moreover, blind spots emerged due to the mainly reactive role of parliament and its fragmented approach to discussing the digital transformation. We conclude that a more anticipatory role of parliament and additional, cross-cutting formats are required to oversee the digital transformation in its integrated complexity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Information Polity
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15701255261486308
Primary Topic
E-Government and Public Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Parliamentary Oversight of Public Values in the Digital Age: An Empirical Analysis of the Dutch Parliament

Rianne Dekker, Albert Meijer, Erna Ruijer
Information Polity
E-Government and Public Services
article

Parliamentary Oversight of Public Values in the Digital Age: An Empirical Analysis of the Dutch Parliament

Rianne Dekker, Albert Meijer, Erna Ruijer
article en

Abstract

While there has been attention for government's role in protecting public values impacted by digital technologies, attention for the role of parliament remains limited. Yet, parliament is the primary place where debate about the impact of technologies on public values takes place and where options to regulate technology are considered. This study examines how Dutch Parliament has responded to the challenge of maintaining oversight of the digital transformation of society and safeguarding public values. Based on a qualitative multiple case study, we demonstrate that parliamentary oversight included the majority of public values impacted by digitalization, but not in a timely and comprehensive way. Moreover, blind spots emerged due to the mainly reactive role of parliament and its fragmented approach to discussing the digital transformation. We conclude that a more anticipatory role of parliament and additional, cross-cutting formats are required to oversee the digital transformation in its integrated complexity.

Information Polity
Utrecht University (NL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
E-Government and Public Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Parliamentary Oversight of Public Values in the Digital Age: An Empirical Analysis of the Dutch Parliament — Rianne Dekker, Albert Meijer, et al. · Information Polity (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS