Zirconia full‐arch implant‐supported prostheses: An up to 8‐year retrospective study with 140 jaws from private practice

Abstract Purpose To assess the survival and complication rates of 140 monolithic zirconia implant‐supported full‐arch fixed complete dental prostheses (IFCDPs) with an up to 8‐year follow‐up at a private practice setting. Materials and Methods A total of 140 edentulous jaws underwent complete‐arch fixed implant treatment with a digital workflow and were rehabilitated with monolithic zirconia IFCDPs. The primary outcome was to assess survival and complication rates, whereas the secondary outcome was to measure the cross‐sectional surface area (CSSA) dimensions (prosthetic space) of those 140 monolithic zirconia IFCDPs and to correlate potential technical complications with the prosthetic space dimensions. Results Out of the 140 zirconia IFCDPs, six fractured, yielding a 95.7% survival rate up to 8‐year follow‐up. Out of these, three fractures were located in the maxilla and three in the mandible. Non‐fractured maxillary IFCDPs had a mean CSSA of 80.5 mm 2 , whereas fractured ones measured 62.5 mm 2 . The connector CSSA of the non‐fractured maxillary IFCDPs was 17.9 mm 2 greater and was statistically significant ( p < 0.001). Non‐fractured mandibular IFCDPs averaged 79.4 mm 2 , whereas fractured ones measured 54 mm 2 . The connector CSSA of the non‐fractured mandibular IFCDPs was 25.4 mm 2 greater, and the difference was statistically significant ( p < 0.001). Non‐fractured maxillary IFCDPs had a mean posterior linear height measurement (prosthetic space) of 10.58 mm, whereas fractured ones measured 9 mm. The 1.58 mm difference was statistically significant ( p = 0.018). Non‐fractured mandibular IFCDPs had a mean posterior prosthetic space of 11.89 mm, compared to 9.55 mm in fractured ones. The 2.34 mm difference was statistically significant ( p < 0.001). Conclusion Monolithic zirconia IFCDPs yielded a 95.7% survival rate after a mean observation period of 3 years (range of 1–8 years). Within the limitations of this study, the maxillary and mandibular connector CSSA should be at least 80 mm 2 , and the linear measurements should be more than 10 mm during CAD design of the final prosthesis to ensure zirconia prosthesis strength against fracture.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Prosthodontics
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.70232
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Zirconia full‐arch implant‐supported prostheses: An up to 8‐year retrospective study with 140 jaws from private practice

Panos Papaspyridakos, Konstantinos Chochlidakis, Sindhu Kanikicharla, Avinash S. Bidra et al.
Journal of Prosthodontics
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

Zirconia full‐arch implant‐supported prostheses: An up to 8‐year retrospective study with 140 jaws from private practice

Panos Papaspyridakos, Konstantinos Chochlidakis, Sindhu Kanikicharla, Avinash S. Bidra, Armand Bedrossian, Abdul Basir Barmak, Panagiotis Ntovas, Marisa Notturno, Lawrence Brecht
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose To assess the survival and complication rates of 140 monolithic zirconia implant‐supported full‐arch fixed complete dental prostheses (IFCDPs) with an up to 8‐year follow‐up at a private practice setting. Materials and Methods A total of 140 edentulous jaws underwent complete‐arch fixed implant treatment with a digital workflow and were rehabilitated with monolithic zirconia IFCDPs. The primary outcome was to assess survival and complication rates, whereas the secondary outcome was to measure the cross‐sectional surface area (CSSA) dimensions (prosthetic space) of those 140 monolithic zirconia IFCDPs and to correlate potential technical complications with the prosthetic space dimensions. Results Out of the 140 zirconia IFCDPs, six fractured, yielding a 95.7% survival rate up to 8‐year follow‐up. Out of these, three fractures were located in the maxilla and three in the mandible. Non‐fractured maxillary IFCDPs had a mean CSSA of 80.5 mm 2 , whereas fractured ones measured 62.5 mm 2 . The connector CSSA of the non‐fractured maxillary IFCDPs was 17.9 mm 2 greater and was statistically significant ( p < 0.001). Non‐fractured mandibular IFCDPs averaged 79.4 mm 2 , whereas fractured ones measured 54 mm 2 . The connector CSSA of the non‐fractured mandibular IFCDPs was 25.4 mm 2 greater, and the difference was statistically significant ( p < 0.001). Non‐fractured maxillary IFCDPs had a mean posterior linear height measurement (prosthetic space) of 10.58 mm, whereas fractured ones measured 9 mm. The 1.58 mm difference was statistically significant ( p = 0.018). Non‐fractured mandibular IFCDPs had a mean posterior prosthetic space of 11.89 mm, compared to 9.55 mm in fractured ones. The 2.34 mm difference was statistically significant ( p < 0.001). Conclusion Monolithic zirconia IFCDPs yielded a 95.7% survival rate after a mean observation period of 3 years (range of 1–8 years). Within the limitations of this study, the maxillary and mandibular connector CSSA should be at least 80 mm 2 , and the linear measurements should be more than 10 mm during CAD design of the final prosthesis to ensure zirconia prosthesis strength against fracture.

Journal of Prosthodontics
University of Geneva (CH), Tufts University (US), Northwell Health (US), University of Connecticut (US), National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR), University of Washington (US), Woburn & North Andover Pediatric Associates (US), Thoughtventions Unlimited (United States) (US), CUNY Advanced Science Research Center (US), Eastman Dental Hospital (GB), University of Rochester (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.