Strongmen and warmaking

This essay asks whether warmaking can discipline the contemporary strongman regimes, as Tilly's account of European state formation might suggest it once did absolutism. To probe this question, it briefly revisits two non-European cases: New Kingdom Ancient Egypt and Warring States China. In neither does the European pattern hold. These historical cases help us identify the scope conditions for the mechanism identified by Tilly. Put briefly, warmaking generates the resistance that can constrain a personalised centre if the mechanisms of extraction are still being built rather than inherited, if the resisters to the centre hold their own autonomous resources, and if the pace of centralisation is slow enough to give the resisters time to organise. Most contemporary strongman regimes lack at least the first two of these, suggesting that warmaking in the twenty-first century will not provide the constraint on personalised, centralised sovereignty as it did in early modern Europe.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Thesis Eleven
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/07255136261487202
Primary Topic
World Systems and Global Transformations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Strongmen and warmaking

Ayşe Zarakol
Thesis Eleven
World Systems and Global Transformations
article

Strongmen and warmaking

Ayşe Zarakol
article en

Abstract

This essay asks whether warmaking can discipline the contemporary strongman regimes, as Tilly's account of European state formation might suggest it once did absolutism. To probe this question, it briefly revisits two non-European cases: New Kingdom Ancient Egypt and Warring States China. In neither does the European pattern hold. These historical cases help us identify the scope conditions for the mechanism identified by Tilly. Put briefly, warmaking generates the resistance that can constrain a personalised centre if the mechanisms of extraction are still being built rather than inherited, if the resisters to the centre hold their own autonomous resources, and if the pace of centralisation is slow enough to give the resisters time to organise. Most contemporary strongman regimes lack at least the first two of these, suggesting that warmaking in the twenty-first century will not provide the constraint on personalised, centralised sovereignty as it did in early modern Europe.

Thesis Eleven
Doğuş University (TR), University of Cambridge (GB), Istanbul University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
World Systems and Global Transformations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Strongmen and warmaking — Ayşe Zarakol · Thesis Eleven (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS