Comparison of SIS-reinforced anastomosis and conventional anastomosis on postoperative AL for middle and low rectal cancer: a study protocol for multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial

Postoperative anastomotic leak (AL) remains a major complication after radical resection of middle and low rectal cancer. Current preventive strategies, such as the creation of a diverting ostomy, effectively mitigate clinical complications. However, they are associated with considerable patient burdens. This clinical trial aims to evaluate whether SIS-reinforced anastomosis with small intestinal submucosa (SIS) can reduce the incidence and severity of AL. This trial was designed as a prospective, parallel, superiority, randomized controlled trial (RCT), involving 44 centers, to compare conventional anastomosis (control group) versus SIS-reinforced anastomosis (experimental group) in radical resection for middle and low rectal cancer. Participants will be randomized 1:1 with stratified block randomization. The primary endpoint is the incidence of AL within 30 days postoperatively to assess the efficacy of SIS-reinforced anastomosis. The secondary endpoints are the severity of AL graded according to the ISREC classification within 30 days postoperatively, incidence of preventive ostomy, reoperation, nosocomial infection, anastomotic stenosis, delayed AL, and the incidence of postoperative diverting ostomy. Furthermore, each participant will be followed for 1 year, and baseline data and safety data will be collected simultaneously. We hypothesized that the incidence of AL within 30 days postoperatively would be 5% and 10% in the experimental group and control group, respectively. With a two-sided α of 0.05 and a power of 0.8, the sample size was calculated to be 966 participants (483 per group), considering a 10% dropout rate. SIS-reinforced anastomosis is expected to reduce the incidence and severity of AL and related mortality after radical resection of middle and low rectal cancer. Moreover, SIS-reinforced anastomosis is expected to potentially reduce unnecessary preventive ostomy. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT07209787. Registered on October 7, 2025, https://clinicaltrials.gov/search?term=NCT07209787&viewType=Card .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Trials
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-026-09995-8
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Comparison of SIS-reinforced anastomosis and conventional anastomosis on postoperative AL for middle and low rectal cancer: a study protocol for multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial

Hao Qu, Chunxiang Ye, Liyuan Fu, Bo Zhao et al.
Trials
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
article

Comparison of SIS-reinforced anastomosis and conventional anastomosis on postoperative AL for middle and low rectal cancer: a study protocol for multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial

Hao Qu, Chunxiang Ye, Liyuan Fu, Bo Zhao, Zhenjun Wang
article en

Abstract

Postoperative anastomotic leak (AL) remains a major complication after radical resection of middle and low rectal cancer. Current preventive strategies, such as the creation of a diverting ostomy, effectively mitigate clinical complications. However, they are associated with considerable patient burdens. This clinical trial aims to evaluate whether SIS-reinforced anastomosis with small intestinal submucosa (SIS) can reduce the incidence and severity of AL. This trial was designed as a prospective, parallel, superiority, randomized controlled trial (RCT), involving 44 centers, to compare conventional anastomosis (control group) versus SIS-reinforced anastomosis (experimental group) in radical resection for middle and low rectal cancer. Participants will be randomized 1:1 with stratified block randomization. The primary endpoint is the incidence of AL within 30 days postoperatively to assess the efficacy of SIS-reinforced anastomosis. The secondary endpoints are the severity of AL graded according to the ISREC classification within 30 days postoperatively, incidence of preventive ostomy, reoperation, nosocomial infection, anastomotic stenosis, delayed AL, and the incidence of postoperative diverting ostomy. Furthermore, each participant will be followed for 1 year, and baseline data and safety data will be collected simultaneously. We hypothesized that the incidence of AL within 30 days postoperatively would be 5% and 10% in the experimental group and control group, respectively. With a two-sided α of 0.05 and a power of 0.8, the sample size was calculated to be 966 participants (483 per group), considering a 10% dropout rate. SIS-reinforced anastomosis is expected to reduce the incidence and severity of AL and related mortality after radical resection of middle and low rectal cancer. Moreover, SIS-reinforced anastomosis is expected to potentially reduce unnecessary preventive ostomy. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT07209787. Registered on October 7, 2025, https://clinicaltrials.gov/search?term=NCT07209787&viewType=Card .

Trials
Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University (CN), Beijing Biocytogen (China) (CN), Beijing Chaoyang Emergency Medical Center (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.