Evaluating the Beck Depression Inventory-II Fast Screen in middle-aged and older adults using random forests and factor analytic methods.

= 6.36) enrolled in an observational research study. Two random forests (RF)-derived scales were compared to the existing BDI-FS in predicting current major depressive episode. Scales were compared using confirmatory factor analysis, measurement invariance, and receiver operating characteristic analysis. Overall, results were comparable across scales. Models based on RF-selected items did not demonstrate better model fit than those based on the BDI-FS; however, scores derived from the RF-selected items exhibited higher reliability. In addition, models based on the RF-derived scales and the BDI-FS showed invariance across demographic and clinical variables. Scores derived from all scales, including RF-derived scales and BDI-FS, showed excellent classification performance in receiver operating characteristic analysis. Future research should further investigate these RF-derived scales, with the BDI-FS, to evaluate their reliability and validity across other diverse populations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychological Assessment
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001494
Primary Topic
Health and Well-being Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Evaluating the Beck Depression Inventory-II Fast Screen in middle-aged and older adults using random forests and factor analytic methods.

Julia Culhane, Hyunjung Lee, Mónica Rivera Mindt, Stephen Cubbellotti et al.
Psychological Assessment
Health and Well-being Studies
article

Evaluating the Beck Depression Inventory-II Fast Screen in middle-aged and older adults using random forests and factor analytic methods.

Julia Culhane, Hyunjung Lee, Mónica Rivera Mindt, Stephen Cubbellotti, Amanda T. Calcetas, Heining Cham, Alyssa Arentoft, Denise S. Oleas, Alexander W. Slaughter, Desiree Byrd, Jessica Robinson-Papp, Ali P. Block, Vanessa A. Guzman, Alexander Robateau, Kaori Kubo Germano, Sandra Talavera, Elizabeth Breen
article en

Abstract

= 6.36) enrolled in an observational research study. Two random forests (RF)-derived scales were compared to the existing BDI-FS in predicting current major depressive episode. Scales were compared using confirmatory factor analysis, measurement invariance, and receiver operating characteristic analysis. Overall, results were comparable across scales. Models based on RF-selected items did not demonstrate better model fit than those based on the BDI-FS; however, scores derived from the RF-selected items exhibited higher reliability. In addition, models based on the RF-derived scales and the BDI-FS showed invariance across demographic and clinical variables. Scores derived from all scales, including RF-derived scales and BDI-FS, showed excellent classification performance in receiver operating characteristic analysis. Future research should further investigate these RF-derived scales, with the BDI-FS, to evaluate their reliability and validity across other diverse populations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

Psychological Assessment
California State University, Northridge (US), Fordham University (US), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University (US), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Health and Well-being Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.