Work–family conflict and psychological well-being: the roles of mindfulness, burnout and segmentation preference

Purpose This study aims to examine how work–family conflict is associated with psychological well-being through workplace mindfulness and burnout, and whether segmentation preference conditions these relationships. Design/methodology/approach Data were collected from 700 full-time employees in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, using a cross-sectional survey. Partial least squares structural equation modeling was applied to test the higher-order psychological well-being construct, indirect associations and moderating effects. Findings Work–family conflict was negatively associated with workplace mindfulness and positively associated with burnout. Workplace mindfulness was positively associated with psychological well-being, whereas burnout was negatively associated with it. The direct association between work–family conflict and psychological well-being was not significant, but both indirect associations were significant. Segmentation preference did not moderate the mindfulness–psychological well-being relationship, but it strengthened the negative associations of work–family conflict and burnout with psychological well-being. Originality/value This study extends work–family research by examining eudaimonic psychological well-being, distinguishing attentional and depletion-related pathways and identifying segmentation preference as a selective vulnerability condition. Because the data are cross-sectional, the findings should be interpreted as associations rather than causal effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Conflict Management
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijcma-04-2026-0139
Primary Topic
Work-Family Balance Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Work–family conflict and psychological well-being: the roles of mindfulness, burnout and segmentation preference

Luc Phan Tan, Nguyen Thanh An
International Journal of Conflict Management
Work-Family Balance Challenges
article

Work–family conflict and psychological well-being: the roles of mindfulness, burnout and segmentation preference

Luc Phan Tan, Nguyen Thanh An
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine how work–family conflict is associated with psychological well-being through workplace mindfulness and burnout, and whether segmentation preference conditions these relationships. Design/methodology/approach Data were collected from 700 full-time employees in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, using a cross-sectional survey. Partial least squares structural equation modeling was applied to test the higher-order psychological well-being construct, indirect associations and moderating effects. Findings Work–family conflict was negatively associated with workplace mindfulness and positively associated with burnout. Workplace mindfulness was positively associated with psychological well-being, whereas burnout was negatively associated with it. The direct association between work–family conflict and psychological well-being was not significant, but both indirect associations were significant. Segmentation preference did not moderate the mindfulness–psychological well-being relationship, but it strengthened the negative associations of work–family conflict and burnout with psychological well-being. Originality/value This study extends work–family research by examining eudaimonic psychological well-being, distinguishing attentional and depletion-related pathways and identifying segmentation preference as a selective vulnerability condition. Because the data are cross-sectional, the findings should be interpreted as associations rather than causal effects.

International Journal of Conflict Management
University of Economics Ho Chi Minh City (VN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Work-Family Balance Challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.