What works in transdiagnostic adult psychiatric day treatment programs? A scoping review of common components contributing to improved mental health outcomes

BACKGROUND: Day Treatment Programs (DTPs) provide intensive, multidisciplinary, non-residential care for adults with acute or complex mental illness. Despite their long-standing role as recovery-oriented alternatives to inpatient admission, contemporary DTPs vary widely in structure and therapeutic orientation. AIMS: To examine differences in transdiagnostic DTP models and review outcome data to inform program development and future research. METHOD: A systematic search across MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycInfo, and CINAHL databases was conducted. Included studies were mapped by location, design, and program characteristics, then narratively synthesized. RESULTS: The initial search yielded 8820 articles, of which twenty met inclusion criteria. Programs reflected diverse therapeutic orientations, including dialectical behavior therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy, and recovery-based models. Participation in DTPs was associated with reduced psychiatric symptoms, improved functioning, and enhanced quality of life. Common therapeutic factors included structured routines, group-based interventions, milieu therapy, person-centered care, and coordination with community and mental health services. Patient satisfaction was generally high, though concerns regarding continuity of care post-discharge were noted. CONCLUSION: Transdiagnostic DTPs across therapeutic orientations appear effective in promoting recovery in adults with mental illness. However, heterogeneity and limited comparative data hinder conclusions about the relative effectiveness of specific models or other treatment-related factors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Mental Health
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2026.2732877
Primary Topic
Psychiatric care and mental health services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

What works in transdiagnostic adult psychiatric day treatment programs? A scoping review of common components contributing to improved mental health outcomes

Vincent Paquin, Aurélie Montagne, Rachel Langevin, Zoë Thomas et al.
Journal of Mental Health
Psychiatric care and mental health services
article

What works in transdiagnostic adult psychiatric day treatment programs? A scoping review of common components contributing to improved mental health outcomes

Vincent Paquin, Aurélie Montagne, Rachel Langevin, Zoë Thomas, Jill Boruff, Kyle T. Greenway
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Day Treatment Programs (DTPs) provide intensive, multidisciplinary, non-residential care for adults with acute or complex mental illness. Despite their long-standing role as recovery-oriented alternatives to inpatient admission, contemporary DTPs vary widely in structure and therapeutic orientation. AIMS: To examine differences in transdiagnostic DTP models and review outcome data to inform program development and future research. METHOD: A systematic search across MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycInfo, and CINAHL databases was conducted. Included studies were mapped by location, design, and program characteristics, then narratively synthesized. RESULTS: The initial search yielded 8820 articles, of which twenty met inclusion criteria. Programs reflected diverse therapeutic orientations, including dialectical behavior therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, acceptance and commitment therapy, and recovery-based models. Participation in DTPs was associated with reduced psychiatric symptoms, improved functioning, and enhanced quality of life. Common therapeutic factors included structured routines, group-based interventions, milieu therapy, person-centered care, and coordination with community and mental health services. Patient satisfaction was generally high, though concerns regarding continuity of care post-discharge were noted. CONCLUSION: Transdiagnostic DTPs across therapeutic orientations appear effective in promoting recovery in adults with mental illness. However, heterogeneity and limited comparative data hinder conclusions about the relative effectiveness of specific models or other treatment-related factors.

Journal of Mental Health
McGill University Health Centre (CA), Jewish General Hospital (CA), McGill University (CA), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Psychiatric care and mental health services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.