Hydraulically Coupled Compressed-Air Energy Storage Systems: A Review of Configurations and Performance with Emphasis on PHCAES

Growing wind and photovoltaic generation increases the demand for large-scale, long-duration energy storage. Pumped hydro compressed-air energy storage (PHCAES) stores and releases energy through pressure transfer between water and compressed air, using air pressure to provide an equivalent hydraulic head and thereby reducing dependence on natural elevation while retaining hydraulic energy conversion and the potential for near-isothermal operation. This review establishes a taxonomy of hydraulically coupled compressed-air storage comprising PHCAES, liquid-piston systems, hydraulically compensated constant-pressure CAES, and hydraulic–pneumatic cascade or hybrid systems. Variable- and constant-pressure PHCAES are compared with pumped hydro energy storage (PHES) and compressed-air energy storage (CAES) in terms of efficiency, economics and environmental implications; this is followed by a critical analysis of the mechanisms governing PHCAES performance. The results show that improved siting flexibility is the principal conditional advantage of PHCAES, rather than inherently higher efficiency or lower cost. Its net performance depends on pressure–volume matching, gas–liquid heat transfer, hydraulic-machine operation, auxiliary consumption and storage infrastructure. Pressure regulation and thermal enhancement are beneficial only when their gains exceed the associated compression, throttling and auxiliary losses. The principal research gap is the lack of engineering-scale, full-cycle validation using consistent electrical, economic and lifecycle assessment boundaries, which currently prevents robust comparison with PHES and CAES.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en19184402
Primary Topic
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Hydraulically Coupled Compressed-Air Energy Storage Systems: A Review of Configurations and Performance with Emphasis on PHCAES

Yan Ren, Huanran Wang, Guangdong Wang, Ziwei Bai et al.
Energies
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
article

Hydraulically Coupled Compressed-Air Energy Storage Systems: A Review of Configurations and Performance with Emphasis on PHCAES

Yan Ren, Huanran Wang, Guangdong Wang, Ziwei Bai, Zhan Yin, Wenjing Huang, Lixiao Zhou, Bo Wang, Yufei Zhang, Yao Wang
article en

Abstract

Growing wind and photovoltaic generation increases the demand for large-scale, long-duration energy storage. Pumped hydro compressed-air energy storage (PHCAES) stores and releases energy through pressure transfer between water and compressed air, using air pressure to provide an equivalent hydraulic head and thereby reducing dependence on natural elevation while retaining hydraulic energy conversion and the potential for near-isothermal operation. This review establishes a taxonomy of hydraulically coupled compressed-air storage comprising PHCAES, liquid-piston systems, hydraulically compensated constant-pressure CAES, and hydraulic–pneumatic cascade or hybrid systems. Variable- and constant-pressure PHCAES are compared with pumped hydro energy storage (PHES) and compressed-air energy storage (CAES) in terms of efficiency, economics and environmental implications; this is followed by a critical analysis of the mechanisms governing PHCAES performance. The results show that improved siting flexibility is the principal conditional advantage of PHCAES, rather than inherently higher efficiency or lower cost. Its net performance depends on pressure–volume matching, gas–liquid heat transfer, hydraulic-machine operation, auxiliary consumption and storage infrastructure. Pressure regulation and thermal enhancement are beneficial only when their gains exceed the associated compression, throttling and auxiliary losses. The principal research gap is the lack of engineering-scale, full-cycle validation using consistent electrical, economic and lifecycle assessment boundaries, which currently prevents robust comparison with PHES and CAES.

EnergiesVol. 19(18)
Electric Power Research Institute (US), State Grid Corporation of China (China) (CN), North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power (CN), Shanghai Electric (China) (CN), Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
Science and Technology Project of State Grid
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.