Tailoring the Atrioventricular Interval During Left Bundle Branch Pacing: Playing With Fusion

BACKGROUND: Optimization of biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with fusion (fusion-optimized intervals method) has been shown to improve left ventricular remodeling. However, information on programming the atrioventricular (AV) interval during left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is scarce. OBJECTIVE: Assess with electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) the electrical benefit of optimization of the AV interval during LBBP. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. Pilot study including patients who received LBBP with CRT indication, normal AV conduction, sinus rhythm, and left bundle branch block. ECGI was used to obtain non-invasive activation maps, ventricular activation times, and QRS widths during the optimization of the AV interval. RESULTS: A total of 10 patients who received LBBP were included. Median age was 62 years (57-74 years), 40% were women, 20% had ischemic cardiomyopathy, and baseline LVEF was 29% (23%-36%). The baseline median QRS duration was 178 ms (168-187 ms), with a left ventricular activation time (LVAT) of 99 ms (90-109 ms), a right ventricular activation time (RVAT) of 42 ms (34-71 ms), and a total ventricular activation time (TAT) of 111 ms (105-131 ms). A non-tailored AV programming showed a QRS measured from intrinsic deflection of 142 ms (137-149 ms); when a tailored AV was programmed, the median QRS decreased to 124 ms (116-130 ms). Ventricular activation times showed shortening with a tailored approach. CONCLUSION: AV interval adjustment during left bundle branch pacing may result in better resynchronization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.70413
Primary Topic
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Tailoring the Atrioventricular Interval During Left Bundle Branch Pacing: Playing With Fusion

Esther Carro, Margarida Pujol‐López, Paz Garre, Eduard Guasch et al.
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
article

Tailoring the Atrioventricular Interval During Left Bundle Branch Pacing: Playing With Fusion

Esther Carro, Margarida Pujol‐López, Paz Garre, Eduard Guasch, José Marı́a Tolosana, Lluı́s Mont, Mireia Niebla, Pasquale Valerio Falzone, Rebeca Domingo, Mariona Regany‐Closa
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Optimization of biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with fusion (fusion-optimized intervals method) has been shown to improve left ventricular remodeling. However, information on programming the atrioventricular (AV) interval during left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is scarce. OBJECTIVE: Assess with electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) the electrical benefit of optimization of the AV interval during LBBP. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. Pilot study including patients who received LBBP with CRT indication, normal AV conduction, sinus rhythm, and left bundle branch block. ECGI was used to obtain non-invasive activation maps, ventricular activation times, and QRS widths during the optimization of the AV interval. RESULTS: A total of 10 patients who received LBBP were included. Median age was 62 years (57-74 years), 40% were women, 20% had ischemic cardiomyopathy, and baseline LVEF was 29% (23%-36%). The baseline median QRS duration was 178 ms (168-187 ms), with a left ventricular activation time (LVAT) of 99 ms (90-109 ms), a right ventricular activation time (RVAT) of 42 ms (34-71 ms), and a total ventricular activation time (TAT) of 111 ms (105-131 ms). A non-tailored AV programming showed a QRS measured from intrinsic deflection of 142 ms (137-149 ms); when a tailored AV was programmed, the median QRS decreased to 124 ms (116-130 ms). Ventricular activation times showed shortening with a tailored approach. CONCLUSION: AV interval adjustment during left bundle branch pacing may result in better resynchronization.

Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES), Centro de Investigación en Red en Enfermedades Cardiovasculares (ES), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (ES), Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES), Consorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer (ES), Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
Sociedad Española de Cardiología, Centres de Recerca de Catalunya, Generalitat de Catalunya, Medical Research Council, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, European Social Fund
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.