Not This Sh*t Again! High-Tension Religions and the Rise of Coercive Control in Child Protection Law

Social scientists and scholars of high-tension religious groups (often referred to as new religious movements or emergent religious groups) have spent nearly half a century debunking the social psychological theory of “brainwashing.” But there is now a veritable brainwashing legal renaissance in child protection guidelines in Japan, several US states, and the UK through the concept of “coercive control.” In this exploratory perspective piece, we trace the ideological lineage of mid-century anti-cult rhetoric into twenty-first-century childcare and child protection frameworks. We argue that the legal doctrine and cultural logic of parens patriae, one means by which the state regulates and mandates the construction of care, is increasingly weaponized to regulate parental religious socialization under the guise of psychological safeguarding, building upon Japanese anti-cult educational guidelines and the American OneTaste trafficking legal case precedent. We hope that this brief discussion pushes back on recent international appetite for the suppression of “deviant” religious liberty within the family unit.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Genealogy
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/genealogy10040141
Primary Topic
Religion, Society, and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Not This Sh*t Again! High-Tension Religions and the Rise of Coercive Control in Child Protection Law

Steven Foertsch, Lilly Penner, Marceline Blackwood
Genealogy
Religion, Society, and Development
article

Not This Sh*t Again! High-Tension Religions and the Rise of Coercive Control in Child Protection Law

Steven Foertsch, Lilly Penner, Marceline Blackwood
article en

Abstract

Social scientists and scholars of high-tension religious groups (often referred to as new religious movements or emergent religious groups) have spent nearly half a century debunking the social psychological theory of “brainwashing.” But there is now a veritable brainwashing legal renaissance in child protection guidelines in Japan, several US states, and the UK through the concept of “coercive control.” In this exploratory perspective piece, we trace the ideological lineage of mid-century anti-cult rhetoric into twenty-first-century childcare and child protection frameworks. We argue that the legal doctrine and cultural logic of parens patriae, one means by which the state regulates and mandates the construction of care, is increasingly weaponized to regulate parental religious socialization under the guise of psychological safeguarding, building upon Japanese anti-cult educational guidelines and the American OneTaste trafficking legal case precedent. We hope that this brief discussion pushes back on recent international appetite for the suppression of “deviant” religious liberty within the family unit.

GenealogyVol. 10(4)
University of California, Santa Barbara (US), Nebraska Wesleyan University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Religion, Society, and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Not This Sh*t Again! High-Tension Religions and the Rise of Coercive Control in Child Protection Law — Steven Foertsch, Lilly Penner, et al. · Genealogy (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS