Algorithmic seeing and human-machine co-interpretation in digital art history

This study examines how convolutional neural networks produce a conditioned mode of algorithmic seeing in art-image analysis. Using an artist attribution task based on more than 7000 paintings, it analyses training dynamics, misclassification patterns, and interpretability outputs to investigate how visual distinctions are organised in feature space under specific dataset, architecture, and pretraining conditions. The results suggest recurrent sensitivity to geometric relations and compositional configurations, rather than direct access to stylistic semantics or historical context. Macro-level misclassification networks reveal model-generated visual proximity relations among artist categories, while micro-level analyses of selected Madonna and Child paintings show template-sensitive spatial responses within individual images. The study reframes interpretability outputs as method-dependent evidential cues and proposes human-machine co-interpretation as a framework for situating computational evidence within contextualised art-historical and heritage interpretation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Heritage Science
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s40494-026-02902-z
Primary Topic
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Algorithmic seeing and human-machine co-interpretation in digital art history

Shuang Xiao
npj Heritage Science
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
article

Algorithmic seeing and human-machine co-interpretation in digital art history

Shuang Xiao
article en

Abstract

This study examines how convolutional neural networks produce a conditioned mode of algorithmic seeing in art-image analysis. Using an artist attribution task based on more than 7000 paintings, it analyses training dynamics, misclassification patterns, and interpretability outputs to investigate how visual distinctions are organised in feature space under specific dataset, architecture, and pretraining conditions. The results suggest recurrent sensitivity to geometric relations and compositional configurations, rather than direct access to stylistic semantics or historical context. Macro-level misclassification networks reveal model-generated visual proximity relations among artist categories, while micro-level analyses of selected Madonna and Child paintings show template-sensitive spatial responses within individual images. The study reframes interpretability outputs as method-dependent evidential cues and proposes human-machine co-interpretation as a framework for situating computational evidence within contextualised art-historical and heritage interpretation.

npj Heritage Science
University College Cork (IE), Tsinghua University (CN)
China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, Tsinghua University
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Algorithmic seeing and human-machine co-interpretation in digital art history — Shuang Xiao · npj Heritage Science (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS