Shall we score? The SHALL-WE score for optimizing sclerotherapy in superficial lymphatic malformations

PURPOSE: No standardized tool guides the decision of when to escalate beyond sclerotherapy in lymphatic malformations (LMs). We developed the SHALL-WE score (Severity, Histology, And Location-Lymphatic malformation: When to Escalate) to define the optimal sclerotherapy threshold in superficial LMs. METHODS: We analyzed 709 patients with superficial LMs from a nationwide survey in Japan. Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of treatment success, used to construct the SHALL-WE score (0-3 points): head and neck location, non-cystic histology, and severe disease (1 point each). The optimal threshold was the session count beyond which success rates fell below the overall mean (63.0%). RESULTS: Treatment success rates decreased with increasing score (score 0: 71.6%, 1: 64.1%, 2: 43.6%, 3: 20.0%; p < 0.001). Optimal thresholds were two sessions for score 0, one for score 1, and early escalation for scores 2-3. Patients managed within thresholds had higher success rates (71.9% vs. 51.2%; adjusted OR 1.921, 95% CI 1.340-2.753, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The SHALL-WE score defines when sclerotherapy is unlikely to succeed and treatment escalation should be considered. Prospective external validation is warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pediatric Surgery International
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-026-06631-z
Primary Topic
Vascular Malformations and Hemangiomas
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Shall we score? The SHALL-WE score for optimizing sclerotherapy in superficial lymphatic malformations

Akihiro Fujino, Takeshi Hirabayashi, Tomoro Hishiki, Motohiro Kano et al.
Pediatric Surgery International
Vascular Malformations and Hemangiomas
article

Shall we score? The SHALL-WE score for optimizing sclerotherapy in superficial lymphatic malformations

Akihiro Fujino, Takeshi Hirabayashi, Tomoro Hishiki, Motohiro Kano, Yohei Yamada, Keita Terui, Naonori Kawakubo, Shunsuke Nosaka, Satoko Yamagishi, Yoshiaki Kinoshita, Shigeru Ueno, Tomoaki Taguchi, Mototoshi Kato, Hiromasa Takei, Michio Ozeki
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: No standardized tool guides the decision of when to escalate beyond sclerotherapy in lymphatic malformations (LMs). We developed the SHALL-WE score (Severity, Histology, And Location-Lymphatic malformation: When to Escalate) to define the optimal sclerotherapy threshold in superficial LMs. METHODS: We analyzed 709 patients with superficial LMs from a nationwide survey in Japan. Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of treatment success, used to construct the SHALL-WE score (0-3 points): head and neck location, non-cystic histology, and severe disease (1 point each). The optimal threshold was the session count beyond which success rates fell below the overall mean (63.0%). RESULTS: Treatment success rates decreased with increasing score (score 0: 71.6%, 1: 64.1%, 2: 43.6%, 3: 20.0%; p < 0.001). Optimal thresholds were two sessions for score 0, one for score 1, and early escalation for scores 2-3. Patients managed within thresholds had higher success rates (71.9% vs. 51.2%; adjusted OR 1.921, 95% CI 1.340-2.753, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The SHALL-WE score defines when sclerotherapy is unlikely to succeed and treatment escalation should be considered. Prospective external validation is warranted.

Pediatric Surgery InternationalVol. 42(1)
Kyushu University (JP), Jichi Medical University (JP), Hirosaki University (JP), Chiba University (JP), Keio University (JP), Fukuoka College of Health Sciences (JP), Okayama University Hospital (JP), National Center For Child Health and Development (JP), Keio University Shonan Fujisawa (JP), Gifu University (JP), Niigata University (JP)
Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Vascular Malformations and Hemangiomas
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.