The Unsteady Aerodynamic Response of the DrivAer Fastback to Longitudinal Acceleration and Deceleration

This study examines the aerodynamic response of a DrivAer fastback model subjected to longitudinal acceleration and deceleration using a time-varying inlet-velocity approach. The accelerating, non-accelerating, and decelerating cases are compared at a common reference velocity to isolate the influence of acceleration history from the effect of instantaneous flow speed. The results show that the DrivAer fastback produces different drag, lift, lift-balance, and wake-field behavior depending on whether the flow is accelerating or decelerating. In comparison to the non-accelerating case, drag decreases during deceleration and increases during acceleration, while the lift distribution also shifts between the front and rear of the vehicle. Flow-field comparisons show that the changes in aerodynamic force are linked to altered flow behavior around the rear-glass, decklid, and wake regions. These results suggest that a quasi-steady interpretation based only on instantaneous velocity is not sufficient to describe the aerodynamic response of road-vehicle geometry under longitudinal acceleration and deceleration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vehicles
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/vehicles8090218
Primary Topic
Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The Unsteady Aerodynamic Response of the DrivAer Fastback to Longitudinal Acceleration and Deceleration

Mesbah Uddin, Brett Peters, Blake Inzinna, Ella Escobar
Vehicles
Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
article

The Unsteady Aerodynamic Response of the DrivAer Fastback to Longitudinal Acceleration and Deceleration

Mesbah Uddin, Brett Peters, Blake Inzinna, Ella Escobar
article en

Abstract

This study examines the aerodynamic response of a DrivAer fastback model subjected to longitudinal acceleration and deceleration using a time-varying inlet-velocity approach. The accelerating, non-accelerating, and decelerating cases are compared at a common reference velocity to isolate the influence of acceleration history from the effect of instantaneous flow speed. The results show that the DrivAer fastback produces different drag, lift, lift-balance, and wake-field behavior depending on whether the flow is accelerating or decelerating. In comparison to the non-accelerating case, drag decreases during deceleration and increases during acceleration, while the lift distribution also shifts between the front and rear of the vehicle. Flow-field comparisons show that the changes in aerodynamic force are linked to altered flow behavior around the rear-glass, decklid, and wake regions. These results suggest that a quasi-steady interpretation based only on instantaneous velocity is not sufficient to describe the aerodynamic response of road-vehicle geometry under longitudinal acceleration and deceleration.

VehiclesVol. 8(9)
University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US), Salisbury University (US)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Unsteady Aerodynamic Response of the DrivAer Fastback to Longitudinal Acceleration and Deceleration — Mesbah Uddin, Brett Peters, et al. · Vehicles (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS