Improved EDM Precision with Advanced Ensemble Machine Learning Prediction for INC-625 Superalloy

This research examines the influence of the EDM machining parameters; including servo voltage, current, angle of cut, pulse on and pulse off times, regarding surface roughness (SR) and material removal rate (MRR), on the machining behavior of the INC-625 superalloy. The L42 machining trials were conducted using Response Surface Methodology - Central Composite Design (RSMCCD) to execute the machining trials. According to ANOVA, servo voltage was the most significant factor affecting both, the surface roughness (80.01%) and the material removal rate (77.33%). The SR decreased by 28.13% when the maximum servo voltage (70V) was employed and the MRR increased by 41.36% when the minimum servo voltage (50V) was employed. In addition, Desirability Analysis (DA) have been utilized to construct a response model to estimate the optimal setting values. Additionally, this study introduces a new heterogenous ensemble machine learning model combining Ridge Regression, Random Forest, XG Boost, and Neural Networks to predict EDM performance metrics. The model achieves high accuracy (R 2 =0.936 for surface roughness, R 2 =0.854 for material removal rate) using an optimized weighted average ensemble model. The ensemble method effectively represents the complex relationship between important process parameters and machining outputs. The validated ensemble model enables realtime EDM process optimization and provides actionable parameter recommendations for different manufacturing objectives. For quality-focused machining, a high servo voltage (70 V), low pulseon time (8 μs), and low current (3 A) produced the lowest surface roughness. For productivityfocused machining, higher pulse-on time (16 μs) and current (5 A) maximized material removal rate. A balanced machining strategy was achieved at intermediate parameter settings (PNT = 12 μs, PFT = 12 μs, SRV = 60-65 V, APC = 4 A, AGC = 60°), offering an effective compromise between machining efficiency and surface quality. These recommendations provide practical decision support guidelines for facilitating data-driven decision-making in industrial EDM applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Surface Review and Letters
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1142/s0218625x26501076
Primary Topic
Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Improved EDM Precision with Advanced Ensemble Machine Learning Prediction for INC-625 Superalloy

N. Babu, L. Balaji, M. Karthikeyan
Surface Review and Letters
Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques
article

Improved EDM Precision with Advanced Ensemble Machine Learning Prediction for INC-625 Superalloy

N. Babu, L. Balaji, M. Karthikeyan
article en

Abstract

This research examines the influence of the EDM machining parameters; including servo voltage, current, angle of cut, pulse on and pulse off times, regarding surface roughness (SR) and material removal rate (MRR), on the machining behavior of the INC-625 superalloy. The L42 machining trials were conducted using Response Surface Methodology - Central Composite Design (RSMCCD) to execute the machining trials. According to ANOVA, servo voltage was the most significant factor affecting both, the surface roughness (80.01%) and the material removal rate (77.33%). The SR decreased by 28.13% when the maximum servo voltage (70V) was employed and the MRR increased by 41.36% when the minimum servo voltage (50V) was employed. In addition, Desirability Analysis (DA) have been utilized to construct a response model to estimate the optimal setting values. Additionally, this study introduces a new heterogenous ensemble machine learning model combining Ridge Regression, Random Forest, XG Boost, and Neural Networks to predict EDM performance metrics. The model achieves high accuracy (R 2 =0.936 for surface roughness, R 2 =0.854 for material removal rate) using an optimized weighted average ensemble model. The ensemble method effectively represents the complex relationship between important process parameters and machining outputs. The validated ensemble model enables realtime EDM process optimization and provides actionable parameter recommendations for different manufacturing objectives. For quality-focused machining, a high servo voltage (70 V), low pulseon time (8 μs), and low current (3 A) produced the lowest surface roughness. For productivityfocused machining, higher pulse-on time (16 μs) and current (5 A) maximized material removal rate. A balanced machining strategy was achieved at intermediate parameter settings (PNT = 12 μs, PFT = 12 μs, SRV = 60-65 V, APC = 4 A, AGC = 60°), offering an effective compromise between machining efficiency and surface quality. These recommendations provide practical decision support guidelines for facilitating data-driven decision-making in industrial EDM applications.

Surface Review and Letters
Twitter (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.