Impact of Voice Onset Time on Phoneme Perception and Implications for a Language-Agnostic Hearing Assessment

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of native language on phoneme perception in normal-hearing (NH) adults representing the three most commonly spoken languages in the United States (English, Spanish, and Mandarin Chinese). METHOD: A prospective cross-sectional study was performed at a tertiary care institution. Ninety-five NH young adults completed Experiment 1: 36 native English, 32 native Mandarin, and 27 native Spanish speakers, with an average age of 21.5 years, recruited from a university population. A subset of 30 NH participants drawn from the Experiment 1 cohort (10 per language group) completed Experiment 2. In Experiment 1, a two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) same-different paradigm was developed using paired stimuli drawn from an 11-step continuum spanning English /d/-/t/ voice onset time (VOT). Pairs were categorized as subtle, intermediate, or pronounced based on degree of VOT contrast. Experiment 2 utilized a 3AFC odd-one-out paradigm with 16 tasks, with an expanded stimulus library. The stimuli were consonant-vowel (CV) and VCV phrases that were inclusive of voicing contrast but also place, manner, and vowel contrasts. RESULTS: = .0059, Bonferroni corrected). No significant differences were observed between English speakers and either of the other groups. In Experiment 2, all three language groups achieved 100% accuracy across phoneme pairs spanning multiple contrast types, with no language-related differences detected. CONCLUSIONS: While native language affects discrimination of intermediate VOT contrasts in NH adults, performance converges when using a broader set of stimuli. These results provide preliminary support for discrimination-based approaches to speech perception assessment and highlight the importance of stimulus selection and task design in minimizing language-related bias. Further studies are required to evaluate sensitivity and clinical applicability in more challenging listening environments and with hard of hearing populations. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.33470986.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Audiology
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1044/2026_aja-26-00031
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Impact of Voice Onset Time on Phoneme Perception and Implications for a Language-Agnostic Hearing Assessment

Christian Jung, Catherine V. Palmer, Jianjing Kuang, William J. Bologna et al.
American Journal of Audiology
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
article

Impact of Voice Onset Time on Phoneme Perception and Implications for a Language-Agnostic Hearing Assessment

Christian Jung, Catherine V. Palmer, Jianjing Kuang, William J. Bologna, Natalie Riebe, Tiffany P. Hwa, Jason A. Brant, Shreya Bathula, Archer R. Schaeffer
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of native language on phoneme perception in normal-hearing (NH) adults representing the three most commonly spoken languages in the United States (English, Spanish, and Mandarin Chinese). METHOD: A prospective cross-sectional study was performed at a tertiary care institution. Ninety-five NH young adults completed Experiment 1: 36 native English, 32 native Mandarin, and 27 native Spanish speakers, with an average age of 21.5 years, recruited from a university population. A subset of 30 NH participants drawn from the Experiment 1 cohort (10 per language group) completed Experiment 2. In Experiment 1, a two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) same-different paradigm was developed using paired stimuli drawn from an 11-step continuum spanning English /d/-/t/ voice onset time (VOT). Pairs were categorized as subtle, intermediate, or pronounced based on degree of VOT contrast. Experiment 2 utilized a 3AFC odd-one-out paradigm with 16 tasks, with an expanded stimulus library. The stimuli were consonant-vowel (CV) and VCV phrases that were inclusive of voicing contrast but also place, manner, and vowel contrasts. RESULTS: = .0059, Bonferroni corrected). No significant differences were observed between English speakers and either of the other groups. In Experiment 2, all three language groups achieved 100% accuracy across phoneme pairs spanning multiple contrast types, with no language-related differences detected. CONCLUSIONS: While native language affects discrimination of intermediate VOT contrasts in NH adults, performance converges when using a broader set of stimuli. These results provide preliminary support for discrimination-based approaches to speech perception assessment and highlight the importance of stimulus selection and task design in minimizing language-related bias. Further studies are required to evaluate sensitivity and clinical applicability in more challenging listening environments and with hard of hearing populations. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.33470986.

American Journal of Audiology
University of the Sciences (US), Center for Applied Linguistics (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Pittsburgh (US), University of the Arts (US), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US), Towson University (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.