The Evolution of Fitness Landscapes: From Visualizing Evolution to Controlling It

Fitness landscapes have long served as a conceptual tool in evolutionary biology. In recent years, however, they have shifted from being viewed primarily as theoretical constructs to being used to interpret experimental data and, increasingly, to guide evolutionary outcomes in biomedical systems. In this review, we trace that progression across major landscape formalisms, including Fisher’s geometric model, Wright’s adaptive landscape, fitness seascapes, and empirical fitness landscapes. We aim to highlight the strengths of each model and its potential for use in cancer research. Rather than treating these frameworks as isolated models, we show how they collectively reflect the field’s maturation: from describing adaptation in idealized settings to quantifying epistasis and evolutionary accessibility, to interpreting experimental genotype–fitness data, and finally to motivating strategies for steering evolution in contexts such as treatment resistance in cancer. We argue that the central promise of the fitness landscape framework now lies not only in explaining evolutionary dynamics, but also in enabling predictive interventions and overcoming cancer evolution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18183014
Primary Topic
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The Evolution of Fitness Landscapes: From Visualizing Evolution to Controlling It

Jacob G. Scott, Meaghan Parks, Jinling Wu, Peng Chen
Cancers
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
article

The Evolution of Fitness Landscapes: From Visualizing Evolution to Controlling It

Jacob G. Scott, Meaghan Parks, Jinling Wu, Peng Chen
article en

Abstract

Fitness landscapes have long served as a conceptual tool in evolutionary biology. In recent years, however, they have shifted from being viewed primarily as theoretical constructs to being used to interpret experimental data and, increasingly, to guide evolutionary outcomes in biomedical systems. In this review, we trace that progression across major landscape formalisms, including Fisher’s geometric model, Wright’s adaptive landscape, fitness seascapes, and empirical fitness landscapes. We aim to highlight the strengths of each model and its potential for use in cancer research. Rather than treating these frameworks as isolated models, we show how they collectively reflect the field’s maturation: from describing adaptation in idealized settings to quantifying epistasis and evolutionary accessibility, to interpreting experimental genotype–fitness data, and finally to motivating strategies for steering evolution in contexts such as treatment resistance in cancer. We argue that the central promise of the fitness landscape framework now lies not only in explaining evolutionary dynamics, but also in enabling predictive interventions and overcoming cancer evolution.

CancersVol. 18(18)
Cleveland Clinic (US), Case Western Reserve University (US)
National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Evolution of Fitness Landscapes: From Visualizing Evolution to Controlling It — Jacob G. Scott, Meaghan Parks, et al. · Cancers (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS