Undercatch corrected gridded precipitation data to improve hydrological modeling in high-alpine orography

Stationary precipitation measurements are frequently affected by undercatch errors, which are particularly pronounced in cold and alpine regions with strong winds. Since gridded precipitation products used in land surface modeling are often derived from spatial interpolation of meteorological station data, these measurement errors propagate directly into gridded datasets. In this study, we train monthly Generalized Additive Models (GAMs) using undercatch corrected station observations, with geographical exposure and terrain elevation as predictors, achieving R 2 values above 0.76 in Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation. We apply these models to generate monthly undercatch correction factors for Austria and – combined with an exposed terrain penalty – use them to adjust existing station-based gridded precipitation products. We validate the undercatch correction using the conceptual rainfall-runoff model COSERO across Austria and in two high-alpine reservoir catchments: Kölnbrein and Schlegeis. Our results demonstrate that retrospectively corrected precipitation reduces runoff simulation biases across Austria, especially in catchments above 1500 m elevation, and closes the water balance in both alpine study regions where uncorrected data showed runoff deficits exceeding 20 %. Biases in snow depth simulations – assessed using the physically-based snowpack model Alpine3D and validated against stereo-satellite observations – decrease from a median difference of −0.87 to +0.15 m. Additionally, undercatch-corrected precipitation enables more realistic simulations of snow covered area during the melting season and long-term glacier volume changes. The proposed method shows promising results in both alpine case study catchments and across Austria, highlighting the importance of accounting for undercatch errors in high-alpine terrain and indicating the need for further research into their magnitude at high elevations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hydrology and earth system sciences
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-5901-2026
Primary Topic
Cryospheric studies and observations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Undercatch corrected gridded precipitation data to improve hydrological modeling in high-alpine orography

Caroline Ehrendorfer, Fabian Lehner, Herbert Formayer, Thomas Pulka et al.
Hydrology and earth system sciences
Cryospheric studies and observations
article

Undercatch corrected gridded precipitation data to improve hydrological modeling in high-alpine orography

Caroline Ehrendorfer, Fabian Lehner, Herbert Formayer, Thomas Pulka, Mathew Herrnegger, Franziska Koch, Sophie Lücking, Philipp Maier
article en

Abstract

Stationary precipitation measurements are frequently affected by undercatch errors, which are particularly pronounced in cold and alpine regions with strong winds. Since gridded precipitation products used in land surface modeling are often derived from spatial interpolation of meteorological station data, these measurement errors propagate directly into gridded datasets. In this study, we train monthly Generalized Additive Models (GAMs) using undercatch corrected station observations, with geographical exposure and terrain elevation as predictors, achieving R 2 values above 0.76 in Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation. We apply these models to generate monthly undercatch correction factors for Austria and – combined with an exposed terrain penalty – use them to adjust existing station-based gridded precipitation products. We validate the undercatch correction using the conceptual rainfall-runoff model COSERO across Austria and in two high-alpine reservoir catchments: Kölnbrein and Schlegeis. Our results demonstrate that retrospectively corrected precipitation reduces runoff simulation biases across Austria, especially in catchments above 1500 m elevation, and closes the water balance in both alpine study regions where uncorrected data showed runoff deficits exceeding 20 %. Biases in snow depth simulations – assessed using the physically-based snowpack model Alpine3D and validated against stereo-satellite observations – decrease from a median difference of −0.87 to +0.15 m. Additionally, undercatch-corrected precipitation enables more realistic simulations of snow covered area during the melting season and long-term glacier volume changes. The proposed method shows promising results in both alpine case study catchments and across Austria, highlighting the importance of accounting for undercatch errors in high-alpine terrain and indicating the need for further research into their magnitude at high elevations.

Hydrology and earth system sciencesVol. 30(18)
Gregor Mendel Institute of Molecular Plant Biology (AT), GeoSphere Austria, BOKU University (AT), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Klima- und Energiefonds
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Cryospheric studies and observations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.