Early Clinical Mediation in End-of-Life Disputes: A Procedural Justice Analysis

{"Conflicts":[0],"arise":[1],"when":[2,72,194],"surrogates":[3],"request":[4],"life-sustaining":[5],"treatments":[6],"that":[7,15,64],"clinicians":[8],"consider":[9],"medically":[10],"futile.":[11],"This":[12],"article":[13],"proposes":[14],"early":[16],"presumptive":[17],"medical":[18],"mediation":[19,53,107,133,178],"with":[20],"opt-out":[21],"provisions":[22],"should":[23],"become":[24],"the":[25,39,150,187],"default":[26],"initial":[27],"offer":[28,176],"for":[29],"resolving":[30],"such":[31,148],"disputes.":[32],"Grounded":[33],"in":[34,163,179],"Rawlsian":[35],"procedural":[36,83,130,188],"justice":[37],"and":[38,44,48,54,69,77,87,97,115,185,190,196,200],"virtue":[40],"of":[41,177,192],"epistemic":[42],"humility,":[43],"informed":[45],"by":[46],"limited":[47],"indirect":[49],"evidence":[50],"from":[51,134],"healthcare":[52],"ICU":[55,211],"communication-facilitation":[56],"programs,":[57],"this":[58],"approach":[59],"offers":[60,81],"a":[61,121],"fair-process":[62],"dialogue":[63],"can":[65,160],"support":[66],"patient-centered":[67],"deliberation":[68],"clinician":[70],"integrity":[71],"embedded":[73,162],"within":[74],"appropriate":[75,197],"legal":[76,126,201],"ethical":[78,199,218],"safeguards.":[79],"Mediation":[80],"four":[82],"advantages:":[84],"(a)":[85],"protected":[86],"appropriately":[88],"inclusive":[89],"voice,":[90],"(b)":[91],"confidential":[92],"caucus,":[93],"(c)":[94],"interest-based":[95],"framing,":[96],"(d)":[98],"outcome":[99,123],"ownership.":[100],"Unlike":[101],"arbitration":[102],"or":[103,124,136,215],"ethics":[104],"committee":[105],"determinations,":[106],"is":[108,143],"structured":[109,157,175],"around":[110],"voluntary":[111],"participation,":[112],"mediator":[113],"neutrality":[114],"confidentiality.":[116],"It":[117],"does":[118],"not":[119,168],"impose":[120],"binding":[122],"reallocate":[125],"decision-making":[127,193],"authority.":[128],"These":[129],"features":[131],"distinguish":[132],"adjudicative":[135],"advisory":[137],"processes,":[138],"although":[139,165],"their":[140],"comparative":[141],"effectiveness":[142],"context-dependent.":[144],"Statutory":[145],"\\"safe-harbor\\"":[146],"models,":[147],"as":[149],"Texas":[151],"Advance":[152],"Directives":[153],"Act,":[154],"illustrate":[155],"how":[156],"dispute-resolution":[158],"frameworks":[159],"be":[161],"policy,":[164],"they":[166],"do":[167],"themselves":[169],"constitute":[170],"mediation.":[171],"Embedding":[172],"an":[173],"early,":[174],"end-of-life":[180],"policy":[181],"may":[182],"reduce":[183],"escalation":[184],"strengthen":[186],"legitimacy":[189],"acceptability":[191],"voluntariness":[195],"clinical,":[198],"safeguards":[202],"are":[203],"maintained.":[204],"However,":[205],"it":[206],"cannot":[207],"guarantee":[208],"agreement,":[209],"shorter":[210],"stays,":[212],"reduced":[213],"litigation,":[214],"substantively":[216],"correct":[217],"outcomes.":[219]}

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Care Analysis
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-026-00599-6
Primary Topic
Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Early Clinical Mediation in End-of-Life Disputes: A Procedural Justice Analysis

Olympia Lioupi
Health Care Analysis
Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
article

Early Clinical Mediation in End-of-Life Disputes: A Procedural Justice Analysis

Olympia Lioupi
article en

Abstract

Conflicts arise when surrogates request life-sustaining treatments that clinicians consider medically futile. This article proposes that early presumptive medical mediation with opt-out provisions should become the default initial offer for resolving such disputes. Grounded in Rawlsian procedural justice and the virtue of epistemic humility, and informed by limited and indirect evidence from healthcare mediation and ICU communication-facilitation programs, this approach offers a fair-process dialogue that can support patient-centered deliberation and clinician integrity when embedded within appropriate legal and ethical safeguards. Mediation offers four procedural advantages: (a) protected and appropriately inclusive voice, (b) confidential caucus, (c) interest-based framing, and (d) outcome ownership. Unlike arbitration or ethics committee determinations, mediation is structured around voluntary participation, mediator neutrality and confidentiality. It does not impose a binding outcome or reallocate legal decision-making authority. These procedural features distinguish mediation from adjudicative or advisory processes, although their comparative effectiveness is context-dependent. Statutory "safe-harbor" models, such as the Texas Advance Directives Act, illustrate how structured dispute-resolution frameworks can be embedded in policy, although they do not themselves constitute mediation. Embedding an early, structured offer of mediation in end-of-life policy may reduce escalation and strengthen the procedural legitimacy and acceptability of decision-making when voluntariness and appropriate clinical, ethical and legal safeguards are maintained. However, it cannot guarantee agreement, shorter ICU stays, reduced litigation, or substantively correct ethical outcomes.

Health Care Analysis
University of Thessaly (GR)
Hellenic Academic Libraries Link
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.