Drug Delivery via Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer With Symmetrical and Asymmetrical High Flow Nasal Cannulas in an Adult Model

Background: Aerosol delivery via high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is widely used. Although an asymmetrical cannula may improve clearance of gases within the anatomical dead space, its impact on aerosol delivery compared with the standard symmetrical cannula remains unclear. This study compared drug delivery efficiency between the symmetrical and asymmetrical cannulas under standardized conditions. Methods: An in vitro adult airway model, comprising a manikin and a ventilator-driven dual-chamber lung model, simulated spontaneous breathing to evaluate aerosol delivery. Filter-captured albuterol from a vibrating mesh nebulizer was quantified by spectrophotometry (230 nm) to determine delivery efficiency (the percentage of an inhaled dose of 2.5-mg nominal dose) for the symmetrical and asymmetrical cannulas over HFNC flows of 10–60 L/min with 4 breathing patterns combining quiet (15 breaths/min) or distressed breathing frequency (30 breaths/min) with low (300 mL) or high (600 mL) tidal volume (V T ). Results: During quiet breathing with low V T , the maximum efficiency of albuterol delivery was higher for the asymmetrical versus the symmetrical cannula (mean ± SD, 6.8 ± 1.7% vs 3.3 ± 1.7% at HFNC flow 20 L/min, respectively , P = .002) but not different with high V T (17.4 ± 1.1% vs 17.6 ± 1.1% at HFNC flow 10 L/min , P = .89). Conversely, during distressed breathing, the maximum delivery efficiency was higher for the symmetrical versus the asymmetrical cannula with both low V T (8.1 ± 1% vs 4.8 ± 0.4% at HFNC flow 10 L/min, respectively , P = .008) and high V T (24.2 ± 1.4% vs 16.2 ± 1.4% at HFNC flow 20 L/min , P < .001). Conclusions: The asymmetrical cannula improved aerosol delivery compared with the symmetrical cannula during quiet breathing with low V T . During distressed breathing, however, the symmetrical cannula was more efficient, regardless of V T . Thus, the asymmetrical and symmetrical cannulas may be selected for drug delivery via a vibrating mesh nebulizer with an HFNC in patients with quiet and distressed breathing, respectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Respiratory Care
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/19433654261481604
Primary Topic
Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Drug Delivery via Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer With Symmetrical and Asymmetrical High Flow Nasal Cannulas in an Adult Model

Takashi Karashima, Yuka Mimura‐Kimura, Yusuke Mimura, Kanade Miyakawa
Respiratory Care
Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
article

Drug Delivery via Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer With Symmetrical and Asymmetrical High Flow Nasal Cannulas in an Adult Model

Takashi Karashima, Yuka Mimura‐Kimura, Yusuke Mimura, Kanade Miyakawa
article en

Abstract

Background: Aerosol delivery via high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is widely used. Although an asymmetrical cannula may improve clearance of gases within the anatomical dead space, its impact on aerosol delivery compared with the standard symmetrical cannula remains unclear. This study compared drug delivery efficiency between the symmetrical and asymmetrical cannulas under standardized conditions. Methods: An in vitro adult airway model, comprising a manikin and a ventilator-driven dual-chamber lung model, simulated spontaneous breathing to evaluate aerosol delivery. Filter-captured albuterol from a vibrating mesh nebulizer was quantified by spectrophotometry (230 nm) to determine delivery efficiency (the percentage of an inhaled dose of 2.5-mg nominal dose) for the symmetrical and asymmetrical cannulas over HFNC flows of 10–60 L/min with 4 breathing patterns combining quiet (15 breaths/min) or distressed breathing frequency (30 breaths/min) with low (300 mL) or high (600 mL) tidal volume (V T ). Results: During quiet breathing with low V T , the maximum efficiency of albuterol delivery was higher for the asymmetrical versus the symmetrical cannula (mean ± SD, 6.8 ± 1.7% vs 3.3 ± 1.7% at HFNC flow 20 L/min, respectively , P = .002) but not different with high V T (17.4 ± 1.1% vs 17.6 ± 1.1% at HFNC flow 10 L/min , P = .89). Conversely, during distressed breathing, the maximum delivery efficiency was higher for the symmetrical versus the asymmetrical cannula with both low V T (8.1 ± 1% vs 4.8 ± 0.4% at HFNC flow 10 L/min, respectively , P = .008) and high V T (24.2 ± 1.4% vs 16.2 ± 1.4% at HFNC flow 20 L/min , P < .001). Conclusions: The asymmetrical cannula improved aerosol delivery compared with the symmetrical cannula during quiet breathing with low V T . During distressed breathing, however, the symmetrical cannula was more efficient, regardless of V T . Thus, the asymmetrical and symmetrical cannulas may be selected for drug delivery via a vibrating mesh nebulizer with an HFNC in patients with quiet and distressed breathing, respectively.

Respiratory Care
National Sanyo Hospital (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.