The pandemic and the shift in social dynamics: how well do existing theoretical frameworks explain volunteering during COVID-19?

This study examines how well existing theoretical frameworks explain formal volunteering amid a public health crisis, focusing on dominant status, social networks, role constraints, and risk perceptions. Grounded in these four theoretical frameworks, the study tests whether the relationships between sociodemographic characteristics and volunteering remained stable or changed during and after COVID-19. The findings reveal that socioeconomic polarization during the pandemic restricted the applicability of dominant status theory to only the highest social strata, whereas the role of social networks remained robust. They also suggest that role constraints from paid work during COVID-19 placed an additional burden on volunteering. However, sociodemographic factors associated with higher risk perception showed no significant difference between during and after COVID-19, likely because virtual volunteering offered a safer alternative for participation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chinese Governance
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23812346.2026.2714349
Primary Topic
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The pandemic and the shift in social dynamics: how well do existing theoretical frameworks explain volunteering during COVID-19?

Young‐Joo Lee
Journal of Chinese Governance
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
article

The pandemic and the shift in social dynamics: how well do existing theoretical frameworks explain volunteering during COVID-19?

Young‐Joo Lee
article en

Abstract

This study examines how well existing theoretical frameworks explain formal volunteering amid a public health crisis, focusing on dominant status, social networks, role constraints, and risk perceptions. Grounded in these four theoretical frameworks, the study tests whether the relationships between sociodemographic characteristics and volunteering remained stable or changed during and after COVID-19. The findings reveal that socioeconomic polarization during the pandemic restricted the applicability of dominant status theory to only the highest social strata, whereas the role of social networks remained robust. They also suggest that role constraints from paid work during COVID-19 placed an additional burden on volunteering. However, sociodemographic factors associated with higher risk perception showed no significant difference between during and after COVID-19, likely because virtual volunteering offered a safer alternative for participation.

Journal of Chinese Governance
Eli Lilly (United States) (US), Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The pandemic and the shift in social dynamics: how well do existing theoretical frameworks explain volunteering during COVID-19? — Young‐Joo Lee · Journal of Chinese Governance (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS