Who gets left behind? Prioritizing assistive technology for persons with disabilities in low-resource urban transport systems: Evidence from Greater Kumasi, Ghana

Assistive technologies (ATs) remain poorly integrated into urban public transport systems in low-resource cities of Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), leaving many persons with disabilities (PwDs) with limited mobility and disproportionate transport barriers. This study examined the awareness, frequency of use, perceived effectiveness, and priority needs of ATs among PwDs within Greater Kumasi. Using an exploratory case study design, data were collected through interviewer-administered surveys from 100 PwDs across four disability groups: physical, visual, hearing, and speech. Chi-square tests and Fisher’s exact test based on Monte Carlo simulation were used to assess associations between disability type and assistive technology (AT) awareness and use; the Kruskal-Wallis test compared perceived AT effectiveness across groups; and the Assistive Technology Priority Index (ATPI) was developed to identify disability groups with higher AT needs. Although 72% of respondents reported awareness of at least one AT, this awareness was concentrated on personal mobility aids, with system-integrated technologies virtually unknown. Disability type was significantly associated with both AT awareness (χ2 = 19.5, p < 0.001) and frequency of use (χ2 = 43.1, p < 0.001). Perceived effectiveness varied significantly across disability groups (H = 21.9, p < 0.001), with respondents with speech impairments reporting comparatively lower perceived effectiveness. The exploratory ATPI further suggested relatively higher assistive technology needs among participants with speech and hearing impairment, though these findings are tentative signals drawn from very small subgroups (n = 11 and n = 5, respectively) and warrant confirmation in larger samples. The findings highlight the importance of equity-oriented and differentiated AT strategies that move beyond personal mobility aids to system-integrated communication and sensory support technologies within urban transport systems. Future research should validate the ATPI against observed mobility outcomes and incorporate perspectives from policymakers, transport planners, and operators.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.103427
Primary Topic
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Who gets left behind? Prioritizing assistive technology for persons with disabilities in low-resource urban transport systems: Evidence from Greater Kumasi, Ghana

Daniel Atuah Obeng, Iddrisu Seidu, Emmanuel Komla Dzisi
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
article

Who gets left behind? Prioritizing assistive technology for persons with disabilities in low-resource urban transport systems: Evidence from Greater Kumasi, Ghana

Daniel Atuah Obeng, Iddrisu Seidu, Emmanuel Komla Dzisi
article en

Abstract

Assistive technologies (ATs) remain poorly integrated into urban public transport systems in low-resource cities of Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), leaving many persons with disabilities (PwDs) with limited mobility and disproportionate transport barriers. This study examined the awareness, frequency of use, perceived effectiveness, and priority needs of ATs among PwDs within Greater Kumasi. Using an exploratory case study design, data were collected through interviewer-administered surveys from 100 PwDs across four disability groups: physical, visual, hearing, and speech. Chi-square tests and Fisher’s exact test based on Monte Carlo simulation were used to assess associations between disability type and assistive technology (AT) awareness and use; the Kruskal-Wallis test compared perceived AT effectiveness across groups; and the Assistive Technology Priority Index (ATPI) was developed to identify disability groups with higher AT needs. Although 72% of respondents reported awareness of at least one AT, this awareness was concentrated on personal mobility aids, with system-integrated technologies virtually unknown. Disability type was significantly associated with both AT awareness (χ2 = 19.5, p < 0.001) and frequency of use (χ2 = 43.1, p < 0.001). Perceived effectiveness varied significantly across disability groups (H = 21.9, p < 0.001), with respondents with speech impairments reporting comparatively lower perceived effectiveness. The exploratory ATPI further suggested relatively higher assistive technology needs among participants with speech and hearing impairment, though these findings are tentative signals drawn from very small subgroups (n = 11 and n = 5, respectively) and warrant confirmation in larger samples. The findings highlight the importance of equity-oriented and differentiated AT strategies that move beyond personal mobility aids to system-integrated communication and sensory support technologies within urban transport systems. Future research should validate the ATPI against observed mobility outcomes and incorporate perspectives from policymakers, transport planners, and operators.

Social Sciences & Humanities OpenVol. 14
Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (GH)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.