Urban- and Block-Scale Road Network Quality from the Perspective of Walking Needs: Research Progress and Future Directions

Road transport is indispensable to urban functioning. As people-centered development and community-oriented planning have gained prominence, pedestrian environments and road network quality have received increasing attention. Existing reviews, however, generally examine either city-scale networks or street-level environments in isolation, leaving a gap in cross-scale synthesis centered on walking needs. Using Web of Science (WOS) as the data source, this review screened 31,650 records and retained 508 publications; CiteSpace 6.4 was used to map the knowledge structure and major research themes. Drawing on the hierarchy-of-needs framework, walking needs are classified into basic needs for feasibility and safety and higher-order needs for convenience, comfort, and experience, with differences interpreted in relation to walking characteristics. City-scale research is reviewed in terms of road network layout, density, hierarchy, and utility, whereas block-scale research is examined through pedestrian routes and intersections, street frontages, and street furniture. The literature indicates that macro-scale attributes such as connectivity, density, and hierarchical structure affect the feasibility and safety of walking at the city scale. At the block scale, attention has expanded from continuity and safety to the convenience of daily travel, environmental comfort, and heterogeneity in perception. Walking, however, is an individual behavior jointly supported by macro-scale road networks and micro-scale street environments. Current research provides limited integration between these scales, often treats each travel mode or road-user group in isolation, and relies heavily on static data that cannot adequately explain temporal changes in environmental conditions or provide timely feedback on network modifications. Future research should therefore develop cross-scale, multimodal, and dynamic analytical frameworks supported by diverse data sources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/land15091730
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Urban- and Block-Scale Road Network Quality from the Perspective of Walking Needs: Research Progress and Future Directions

Qiyao Yang, Mengzhen Ding, Mengjia Wang, Huining Tian et al.
Land
Urban Transport and Accessibility
article

Urban- and Block-Scale Road Network Quality from the Perspective of Walking Needs: Research Progress and Future Directions

Qiyao Yang, Mengzhen Ding, Mengjia Wang, Huining Tian, Yishuang Wu, Lemei Li, Jiaqi Xu, Jun Cai
article en

Abstract

Road transport is indispensable to urban functioning. As people-centered development and community-oriented planning have gained prominence, pedestrian environments and road network quality have received increasing attention. Existing reviews, however, generally examine either city-scale networks or street-level environments in isolation, leaving a gap in cross-scale synthesis centered on walking needs. Using Web of Science (WOS) as the data source, this review screened 31,650 records and retained 508 publications; CiteSpace 6.4 was used to map the knowledge structure and major research themes. Drawing on the hierarchy-of-needs framework, walking needs are classified into basic needs for feasibility and safety and higher-order needs for convenience, comfort, and experience, with differences interpreted in relation to walking characteristics. City-scale research is reviewed in terms of road network layout, density, hierarchy, and utility, whereas block-scale research is examined through pedestrian routes and intersections, street frontages, and street furniture. The literature indicates that macro-scale attributes such as connectivity, density, and hierarchical structure affect the feasibility and safety of walking at the city scale. At the block scale, attention has expanded from continuity and safety to the convenience of daily travel, environmental comfort, and heterogeneity in perception. Walking, however, is an individual behavior jointly supported by macro-scale road networks and micro-scale street environments. Current research provides limited integration between these scales, often treats each travel mode or road-user group in isolation, and relies heavily on static data that cannot adequately explain temporal changes in environmental conditions or provide timely feedback on network modifications. Future research should therefore develop cross-scale, multimodal, and dynamic analytical frameworks supported by diverse data sources.

LandVol. 15(9)
Dalian University of Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.