Handgrip strength asymmetry and cardiometabolic multimorbidity in Chinese middle-aged and older adults: a longitudinal cohort study

BACKGROUND: Handgrip strength asymmetry has been associated with adverse health outcomes, but its longitudinal association with incident cardiometabolic multimorbidity (CMM) remains unclear. We examined this association and conducted exploratory analyses across sleep duration and restless-sleep frequency categories. METHODS: This longitudinal cohort study included 8132 Chinese adults aged 45-80 years without CMM at baseline from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (2011-2020). Handgrip asymmetry was defined as a ≥ 10% relative difference between hands, and low grip strength was defined according to the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 criteria. Participants were categorized as symmetric with normal strength (G1), asymmetric only (G2), weak only (G3), or both asymmetric and weak (G4). Incident CMM was defined as the presence of at least two conditions among diabetes, heart disease, and stroke during follow-up. Cox proportional hazards models, restricted cubic splines, stratified analyses, and sensitivity analysis were performed. RESULTS: During follow-up, 848 participants (10.4%) developed incident CMM. In the fully adjusted model, G2 was associated with a 23% higher risk of incident CMM compared with G1 (HR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.06-1.42), while G4 was associated with a 67% higher risk (HR = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.27-2.20). G3 was not significantly associated with incident CMM (HR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.76-1.56). Continuous asymmetry was positively associated with CMM risk, and restricted cubic spline analysis showed a significant overall association but no statistically significant evidence of nonlinearity. No significant multiplicative interactions were observed between handgrip status and restless-sleep frequency or sleep duration (P for interaction = 0.444 and 0.350, respectively), and additive interaction analyses were also non-significant. Sensitivity analyses yielded broadly similar estimates in several alternative models, although the associations for G2 and G4 were attenuated in the analysis restricted to participants without baseline cardiometabolic disease. CONCLUSIONS: Handgrip strength asymmetry was associated with a higher risk of incident CMM, particularly when accompanied by low grip strength. Weakness alone was not significantly associated with CMM in this cohort. Exploratory analyses provided no evidence that sleep duration or restless-sleep frequency significantly modified these associations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Experimental Gerontology
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2026.113329
Primary Topic
Nutrition and Health in Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Handgrip strength asymmetry and cardiometabolic multimorbidity in Chinese middle-aged and older adults: a longitudinal cohort study

Ke Wang, Haibin Wu, Lei Huang, Yu Huang et al.
Experimental Gerontology
Nutrition and Health in Aging
article

Handgrip strength asymmetry and cardiometabolic multimorbidity in Chinese middle-aged and older adults: a longitudinal cohort study

Ke Wang, Haibin Wu, Lei Huang, Yu Huang, Yanwen Gao, Jiming Shao, Jing Yu
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Handgrip strength asymmetry has been associated with adverse health outcomes, but its longitudinal association with incident cardiometabolic multimorbidity (CMM) remains unclear. We examined this association and conducted exploratory analyses across sleep duration and restless-sleep frequency categories. METHODS: This longitudinal cohort study included 8132 Chinese adults aged 45-80 years without CMM at baseline from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (2011-2020). Handgrip asymmetry was defined as a ≥ 10% relative difference between hands, and low grip strength was defined according to the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 criteria. Participants were categorized as symmetric with normal strength (G1), asymmetric only (G2), weak only (G3), or both asymmetric and weak (G4). Incident CMM was defined as the presence of at least two conditions among diabetes, heart disease, and stroke during follow-up. Cox proportional hazards models, restricted cubic splines, stratified analyses, and sensitivity analysis were performed. RESULTS: During follow-up, 848 participants (10.4%) developed incident CMM. In the fully adjusted model, G2 was associated with a 23% higher risk of incident CMM compared with G1 (HR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.06-1.42), while G4 was associated with a 67% higher risk (HR = 1.67, 95% CI: 1.27-2.20). G3 was not significantly associated with incident CMM (HR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.76-1.56). Continuous asymmetry was positively associated with CMM risk, and restricted cubic spline analysis showed a significant overall association but no statistically significant evidence of nonlinearity. No significant multiplicative interactions were observed between handgrip status and restless-sleep frequency or sleep duration (P for interaction = 0.444 and 0.350, respectively), and additive interaction analyses were also non-significant. Sensitivity analyses yielded broadly similar estimates in several alternative models, although the associations for G2 and G4 were attenuated in the analysis restricted to participants without baseline cardiometabolic disease. CONCLUSIONS: Handgrip strength asymmetry was associated with a higher risk of incident CMM, particularly when accompanied by low grip strength. Weakness alone was not significantly associated with CMM in this cohort. Exploratory analyses provided no evidence that sleep duration or restless-sleep frequency significantly modified these associations.

Experimental GerontologyVol. 225
Lanzhou University Second Hospital (CN), Lanzhou University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Nutrition and Health in Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.