The state of diversity, equity, and inclusion in the cloud physics community

The Geosciences are amongst the least diverse research fields, where women and other underrepresented groups face systemic biases. This paper presents the state of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in the cloud-physics community, by combining a metadata analysis of 6987 cloud-physics peer-reviewed journal articles published between 1970 and 2020 with responses from a survey of 198 participants from the cloud-physics community. Women first-author contributions are evident only after 1997 and presently only ∼ 17 % of studies in the cloud physics field are led by women. Authors from the Global North dominate first and corresponding-author positions, with only ∼ 5 % of studies led by tropics-based scientists (TBS). The latter's participation was low even for study sites in the tropics, suggesting widespread practice of parachute science. Of the survey respondents, 23 % identified as historically and currently excluded and feel that belonging to this group has had a negative impact on their scientific career, in terms of collaborations, promotions, publishing, funding, salary, and citations. Although the survey data shows the general experiences of cloud physicists globally, the perspectives from this work can aid the cloud-physics community to develop strategies to improve DEI in institutions beyond a business case for a diverse science community. Rather we should consider an equity-centered approach by understanding our ethical responsibilities to benefit research of the climate system, as it is promoted by the International Association for Promoting Geoethics (IAPG) in Geosciences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoscience Communication
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/gc-9-415-2026
Primary Topic
Career Development and Diversity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The state of diversity, equity, and inclusion in the cloud physics community

Diana L. Pereira, Luis A. Ladino, Zamin A. Kanji, Karin Ardon‐Dryer et al.
Geoscience Communication
Career Development and Diversity
article

The state of diversity, equity, and inclusion in the cloud physics community

Diana L. Pereira, Luis A. Ladino, Zamin A. Kanji, Karin Ardon‐Dryer, Zyanya Ramírez-Díaz, Ulrike Proske, Antonia Velicu
article en

Abstract

The Geosciences are amongst the least diverse research fields, where women and other underrepresented groups face systemic biases. This paper presents the state of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) in the cloud-physics community, by combining a metadata analysis of 6987 cloud-physics peer-reviewed journal articles published between 1970 and 2020 with responses from a survey of 198 participants from the cloud-physics community. Women first-author contributions are evident only after 1997 and presently only ∼ 17 % of studies in the cloud physics field are led by women. Authors from the Global North dominate first and corresponding-author positions, with only ∼ 5 % of studies led by tropics-based scientists (TBS). The latter's participation was low even for study sites in the tropics, suggesting widespread practice of parachute science. Of the survey respondents, 23 % identified as historically and currently excluded and feel that belonging to this group has had a negative impact on their scientific career, in terms of collaborations, promotions, publishing, funding, salary, and citations. Although the survey data shows the general experiences of cloud physicists globally, the perspectives from this work can aid the cloud-physics community to develop strategies to improve DEI in institutions beyond a business case for a diverse science community. Rather we should consider an equity-centered approach by understanding our ethical responsibilities to benefit research of the climate system, as it is promoted by the International Association for Promoting Geoethics (IAPG) in Geosciences.

Geoscience CommunicationVol. 9(3)
Texas Tech University (US), University of Helsinki (FI), University of Zurich (CH), ETH Zurich (CH), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
National Science Foundation, Texas Tech University, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Horizon 2020
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Career Development and Diversity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.