How do government-guided funds enhance employment scale?: evidence from China

Drawing on prefecture-level panel data from 2007 to 2023 and government-guided fund data from the Zero2IPO Private Equity Database, this study employs a staggered difference-in-differences (DID) model to examine the impact of government-guided funds on regional employment, along with the underlying mechanisms and boundary conditions. The findings reveal that: (1) government-guided funds significantly enhance regional employment scale; (2) the employment effect operates through four channels: amplifying venture capital, increasing financial loans, augmenting fiscal expenditure on employment, and stimulating entrepreneurship; (3) the effect is stronger in peripheral cities, non-eastern regions, and the secondary sector, with venture capital funds outperforming industrial investment funds, while PPP funds show no significant effect; and (4) local fiscal expenditures on science and technology, education, and environmental protection reinforce this employment impact, highlighting the value of policy synergy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Economics
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2026.2733806
Primary Topic
Innovation Policy and R&D
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

How do government-guided funds enhance employment scale?: evidence from China

Pengxiang Huang, Xiang Huang
Applied Economics
Innovation Policy and R&D
article

How do government-guided funds enhance employment scale?: evidence from China

Pengxiang Huang, Xiang Huang
article en

Abstract

Drawing on prefecture-level panel data from 2007 to 2023 and government-guided fund data from the Zero2IPO Private Equity Database, this study employs a staggered difference-in-differences (DID) model to examine the impact of government-guided funds on regional employment, along with the underlying mechanisms and boundary conditions. The findings reveal that: (1) government-guided funds significantly enhance regional employment scale; (2) the employment effect operates through four channels: amplifying venture capital, increasing financial loans, augmenting fiscal expenditure on employment, and stimulating entrepreneurship; (3) the effect is stronger in peripheral cities, non-eastern regions, and the secondary sector, with venture capital funds outperforming industrial investment funds, while PPP funds show no significant effect; and (4) local fiscal expenditures on science and technology, education, and environmental protection reinforce this employment impact, highlighting the value of policy synergy.

Applied Economics
Guangdong University Of Finances and Economics (CN), University of Finance and Economics (MN), Guangdong University of Finance (CN), Guangzhou College of Commerce
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Innovation Policy and R&D
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How do government-guided funds enhance employment scale?: evidence from China — Pengxiang Huang, Xiang Huang · Applied Economics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS