Comparison of Caffeine Content in Coffee and Yerba Mate Prepared According to Traditional Consumption Methods in Argentina

The amount of caffeine provided by a beverage depends not only on its source but also on the preparation method and the amount consumed. In Argentina, coffee and yerba mate are habitual sources of caffeine, yet their actual contribution according to preparation method has not been clearly established. This study quantified and compared the caffeine content of beverages commonly consumed in the country, including espresso and filter coffee, instant coffee, mate cocido, and yerba mate with and without stems across 15 consecutive servings under conditions simulating habitual consumption. Caffeine was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography with diode-array detection (HPLC-DAD). The highest caffeine concentrations were observed in beverages prepared with an espresso machine (225.0–533.9 mg/100 mL), followed by filter coffee (60.2–119.0 mg/100 mL), instant coffee (39.9–60.2 mg/100 mL), and mate cocido (17.3–18.4 mg/100 mL). In yerba mate, total caffeine extraction across 15 servings was 243 mg for samples with stems and 273 mg for stem-free samples. The first four servings provided an amount of caffeine comparable to that of a single espresso. Several preparations exceeded 200 mg per intake, whereas two cups of mate cocido could reach the suggested limit for the pediatric population. These findings show that the preparation method substantially modifies caffeine exposure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Beverages
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/beverages12090112
Primary Topic
Coffee research and impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Comparison of Caffeine Content in Coffee and Yerba Mate Prepared According to Traditional Consumption Methods in Argentina

Mercedes Cirio, Marcela Villarreal, Mariano Simón, David J. Fragale et al.
Beverages
Coffee research and impacts
article

Comparison of Caffeine Content in Coffee and Yerba Mate Prepared According to Traditional Consumption Methods in Argentina

Mercedes Cirio, Marcela Villarreal, Mariano Simón, David J. Fragale, Ignacio Ghirardelli, Marta Verta, Camila Santana Smersu
article en

Abstract

The amount of caffeine provided by a beverage depends not only on its source but also on the preparation method and the amount consumed. In Argentina, coffee and yerba mate are habitual sources of caffeine, yet their actual contribution according to preparation method has not been clearly established. This study quantified and compared the caffeine content of beverages commonly consumed in the country, including espresso and filter coffee, instant coffee, mate cocido, and yerba mate with and without stems across 15 consecutive servings under conditions simulating habitual consumption. Caffeine was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography with diode-array detection (HPLC-DAD). The highest caffeine concentrations were observed in beverages prepared with an espresso machine (225.0–533.9 mg/100 mL), followed by filter coffee (60.2–119.0 mg/100 mL), instant coffee (39.9–60.2 mg/100 mL), and mate cocido (17.3–18.4 mg/100 mL). In yerba mate, total caffeine extraction across 15 servings was 243 mg for samples with stems and 273 mg for stem-free samples. The first four servings provided an amount of caffeine comparable to that of a single espresso. Several preparations exceeded 200 mg per intake, whereas two cups of mate cocido could reach the suggested limit for the pediatric population. These findings show that the preparation method substantially modifies caffeine exposure.

BeveragesVol. 12(9)
National Technological University (AR), National University of General San Martín (AR), National Institute of Industrial Technology (AR)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Coffee research and impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.