Environmental Degradation and Sustainability Governance in Colombia: An Integrative Review

Environmental degradation in Colombia is often studied through separate sectoral lenses, although air pollution, emerging water contaminants, urban noise, mining-related soil contamination, artisanal-mining exposure, and material throughput arise from overlapping institutional and economic conditions. This review compares these domains to identify how environmental-health protection, social equity, resource use, and implementation capacity can inform sustainability governance. A structured integrative synthesis of 62 peer-reviewed, institutional, and conceptual sources organized evidence into cross-domain matrices and six ordinal dimensions: structural entrenchment, human-health burden, ecological propagation, persistence, financing attribution, and implementation complexity. A pattern was treated as convergent when it recurred in at least four domains and retained its meaning under a three-domain sensitivity threshold. Four convergences were identified: lock-in in mobility, production, and livelihood systems; coupled health–ecosystem effects; disproportionate exposure under informality and territorial inequality; and the need for policy portfolios rather than single instruments. Three divergences shaped feasible action: flow versus stock pollution, short versus long response horizons, and concentrated versus diffuse financing responsibility. The synthesis supports a proposed dual-track framework. Immediate measures prioritize source control, surveillance, safer work, and protection of exposed populations; longer-term measures address clean infrastructure, remediation, and the redesign of production and consumption. The profiles, horizons, and portfolio shares are interpretive planning tools, not measured effects, aggregate rankings, or optimized allocations. The contribution is the integration of established governance concepts into a Colombian comparison that connects urgent exposure reduction with equitable, sustained environmental improvement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18189539
Primary Topic
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Environmental Degradation and Sustainability Governance in Colombia: An Integrative Review

Osnamir Bru-Cordero, Cristian David Correa Álvarez, Efraín de Jesús Hernández Buelvas, Fermina Vasquez Osorio et al.
Sustainability
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
article

Environmental Degradation and Sustainability Governance in Colombia: An Integrative Review

Osnamir Bru-Cordero, Cristian David Correa Álvarez, Efraín de Jesús Hernández Buelvas, Fermina Vasquez Osorio, Gladis Mercedes Canchila-Paternina
article en

Abstract

Environmental degradation in Colombia is often studied through separate sectoral lenses, although air pollution, emerging water contaminants, urban noise, mining-related soil contamination, artisanal-mining exposure, and material throughput arise from overlapping institutional and economic conditions. This review compares these domains to identify how environmental-health protection, social equity, resource use, and implementation capacity can inform sustainability governance. A structured integrative synthesis of 62 peer-reviewed, institutional, and conceptual sources organized evidence into cross-domain matrices and six ordinal dimensions: structural entrenchment, human-health burden, ecological propagation, persistence, financing attribution, and implementation complexity. A pattern was treated as convergent when it recurred in at least four domains and retained its meaning under a three-domain sensitivity threshold. Four convergences were identified: lock-in in mobility, production, and livelihood systems; coupled health–ecosystem effects; disproportionate exposure under informality and territorial inequality; and the need for policy portfolios rather than single instruments. Three divergences shaped feasible action: flow versus stock pollution, short versus long response horizons, and concentrated versus diffuse financing responsibility. The synthesis supports a proposed dual-track framework. Immediate measures prioritize source control, surveillance, safer work, and protection of exposed populations; longer-term measures address clean infrastructure, remediation, and the redesign of production and consumption. The profiles, horizons, and portfolio shares are interpretive planning tools, not measured effects, aggregate rankings, or optimized allocations. The contribution is the integration of established governance concepts into a Colombian comparison that connects urgent exposure reduction with equitable, sustained environmental improvement.

SustainabilityVol. 18(18)
Universidad Nacional de La Pampa (AR), Universidad Nacional de Colombia (CO), Universidad del Sinú (CO), Universidad de Manizales (CO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Environmental and Social Impact Assessments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.