Use of Flow-Through Fibula Flaps in Head and Neck Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

Background: The application of the flow-through free fibula flap (FTFFF) in head and neck reconstruction is understudied. This systematic review evaluates indications, techniques, and outcomes of FTFFF. Methods: A systematic review of the literature reviewing FTFFF in head and neck reconstruction was conducted. Patient demographics, defect characteristics, surgical indications and techniques, and postoperative outcomes were collected. Results: 19 patients across 10 studies were included. Median patient age was 47 years (IQR 24.5 – 55.0); 36.8% were male, 31.6% female, 31.6% not specified. Median follow-up time was 9 months (IQR 6.0-17.0). 14 patients (73.7 %) underwent mandible-only reconstruction, 3 (15.8%) maxilla-only reconstruction, and 2 (10.5 %) combined maxillomandibular reconstruction. Etiologies included oncologic (n=16), trauma (n=2), and congenital (n = 1). 15.7% (n=3) underwent preoperative radiotherapy. FTFFF was indicated for defect requiring multiple flaps (n=9), lack of skin perforators during harvest (n=6), lack of recipient vessels (n=4), and TMJ reconstruction (n=3). Recipient arteries included facial (n=10), external carotid (n=5), and superior thyroid (n=3); recipient veins included facial (n=8), internal (n=2) or external jugular (n=2), and retromandibular (n= 1). All flaps survived at 6 months. Complications occurred in 31.5% (n=6); hematoma (n=2), venous occlusion (n=2), and wound dehiscence (n=2). Four patients required immediate reoperation. 15.8% (n=3) underwent planned revisions. Preoperative radiation was not significantly associated with postoperative complications (OR 7.20, 95% CI 0.48–108.0; p = 0.236). Logistic regression demonstrated that increasing defect size did not increase complication risk. Conclusions: The FTFFF can be reliably used to reconstruct complex head and neck defects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery Open
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2960-1984
Primary Topic
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Use of Flow-Through Fibula Flaps in Head and Neck Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

David Y. Khechoyan, Jason Yu, 吴钦孝, David W. Mathes et al.
Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery Open
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
article

Use of Flow-Through Fibula Flaps in Head and Neck Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

David Y. Khechoyan, Jason Yu, 吴钦孝, David W. Mathes, Lauren Kiel, Mark Greyson, Celia J. Ernstrom, Katie Egan, Christodoulos Kaoutzanis
article en

Abstract

Background: The application of the flow-through free fibula flap (FTFFF) in head and neck reconstruction is understudied. This systematic review evaluates indications, techniques, and outcomes of FTFFF. Methods: A systematic review of the literature reviewing FTFFF in head and neck reconstruction was conducted. Patient demographics, defect characteristics, surgical indications and techniques, and postoperative outcomes were collected. Results: 19 patients across 10 studies were included. Median patient age was 47 years (IQR 24.5 – 55.0); 36.8% were male, 31.6% female, 31.6% not specified. Median follow-up time was 9 months (IQR 6.0-17.0). 14 patients (73.7 %) underwent mandible-only reconstruction, 3 (15.8%) maxilla-only reconstruction, and 2 (10.5 %) combined maxillomandibular reconstruction. Etiologies included oncologic (n=16), trauma (n=2), and congenital (n = 1). 15.7% (n=3) underwent preoperative radiotherapy. FTFFF was indicated for defect requiring multiple flaps (n=9), lack of skin perforators during harvest (n=6), lack of recipient vessels (n=4), and TMJ reconstruction (n=3). Recipient arteries included facial (n=10), external carotid (n=5), and superior thyroid (n=3); recipient veins included facial (n=8), internal (n=2) or external jugular (n=2), and retromandibular (n= 1). All flaps survived at 6 months. Complications occurred in 31.5% (n=6); hematoma (n=2), venous occlusion (n=2), and wound dehiscence (n=2). Four patients required immediate reoperation. 15.8% (n=3) underwent planned revisions. Preoperative radiation was not significantly associated with postoperative complications (OR 7.20, 95% CI 0.48–108.0; p = 0.236). Logistic regression demonstrated that increasing defect size did not increase complication risk. Conclusions: The FTFFF can be reliably used to reconstruct complex head and neck defects.

Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery Open
University of Colorado System (US), Children's Hospital Colorado (US), AdventHealth Tampa (US), AdventHealth Daytona Beach (US), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.