Comparative Surface Microbial Contamination of a Cardboard Spacer MDI PLUS® and Conventional Plastic Inhalation Devices under Simulated Repeated Use

Background Pressurized metered-dose inhalers and spacer devices repeatedly come in contact with the mouth, raising concerns regarding microbiological contamination during routine use. Limited data compares microbial contamination across different spacer materials under simulated real-world handling and storage conditions.Methods We quantified external and internal-surface bioburden (CFU/cm2) on the plastic AeroChamber Plus® valved holding chamber, plastic pMDI mouthpieces, and the cardboard MDI PLUS® spacer at baseline and after a standardized use protocol of 20 actuations (4 actuations/day for 5 days) followed by 7 days of ambient storage. Testing was performed with salbutamol (100 µg), beclometasone (250 µg), and a beclometasone/salbutamol combination (250/100 µg). Organisms were cultured on selective media and identified by standard biochemical assays and Analytical Profile Index (API).Results Across all formulations and time points, the cardboard MDI PLUS® spacer consistently showed lower recoverable surface microbial contamination compared with the plastic devices (AeroChamber Plus® and pMDI mouthpiece). Gram-negative organisms, including Pseudomonas spp., were detected on plastic spacers and pMDI mouthpieces but were not recovered from the cardboard spacer under any condition. Total microbial counts on plastic devices ranged from approximately 40 - 48 CFU/cm2, whereas counts on the cardboard spacer remained lower, ranging from approximately 22 - 26 CFU/cm2. Candida albicans was detected on plastic devices, but was not recovered from the cardboard spacer following repeated use and storage in some formulations.Conclusions Under simulated repeated use, the cardboard-based spacer exhibited lower recoverable surface microbial contamination than the conventional plastic inhalation devices. These data highlight the potential influence of device material on microbial retention and may inform device selection and hygiene practices in routine respiratory care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Asthma
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02770903.2026.2734969
Primary Topic
Occupational exposure and asthma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Comparative Surface Microbial Contamination of a Cardboard Spacer MDI PLUS® and Conventional Plastic Inhalation Devices under Simulated Repeated Use

Hadeer S. Harb, Raffah Khamis Mahal, Mina Nicola, Yasmin M. Madney et al.
Journal of Asthma
Occupational exposure and asthma
article

Comparative Surface Microbial Contamination of a Cardboard Spacer MDI PLUS® and Conventional Plastic Inhalation Devices under Simulated Repeated Use

Hadeer S. Harb, Raffah Khamis Mahal, Mina Nicola, Yasmin M. Madney, M Abdelrahim, Ahmed H.M. Sobh, Ahlam Ismail, Abeer Salah Eldin Mohamed
article en

Abstract

Background Pressurized metered-dose inhalers and spacer devices repeatedly come in contact with the mouth, raising concerns regarding microbiological contamination during routine use. Limited data compares microbial contamination across different spacer materials under simulated real-world handling and storage conditions.Methods We quantified external and internal-surface bioburden (CFU/cm2) on the plastic AeroChamber Plus® valved holding chamber, plastic pMDI mouthpieces, and the cardboard MDI PLUS® spacer at baseline and after a standardized use protocol of 20 actuations (4 actuations/day for 5 days) followed by 7 days of ambient storage. Testing was performed with salbutamol (100 µg), beclometasone (250 µg), and a beclometasone/salbutamol combination (250/100 µg). Organisms were cultured on selective media and identified by standard biochemical assays and Analytical Profile Index (API).Results Across all formulations and time points, the cardboard MDI PLUS® spacer consistently showed lower recoverable surface microbial contamination compared with the plastic devices (AeroChamber Plus® and pMDI mouthpiece). Gram-negative organisms, including Pseudomonas spp., were detected on plastic spacers and pMDI mouthpieces but were not recovered from the cardboard spacer under any condition. Total microbial counts on plastic devices ranged from approximately 40 - 48 CFU/cm2, whereas counts on the cardboard spacer remained lower, ranging from approximately 22 - 26 CFU/cm2. Candida albicans was detected on plastic devices, but was not recovered from the cardboard spacer following repeated use and storage in some formulations.Conclusions Under simulated repeated use, the cardboard-based spacer exhibited lower recoverable surface microbial contamination than the conventional plastic inhalation devices. These data highlight the potential influence of device material on microbial retention and may inform device selection and hygiene practices in routine respiratory care.

Journal of Asthma
Beni-Suef University (EG), Mashreq University (SD), Badr University in Cairo (EG), Assiut University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Occupational exposure and asthma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.