Performance evaluation of a scent transfer unit for sampling of explosives and their residues to investigate nuisance alerts

Abstract Volatile organic compounds associated with explosives such as Composition C‐4 serve as important targets for canine training as well as field analysis. In parallel, 1‐bromooctane (1‐BO) is a benchmark to contextualize canine performance and aid interpretation of results. Improved understanding of the collection and recovery of these odorants is important for optimizing canine training aids, interpreting canine responses, and better understanding factors that may contribute to nuisance alerts. This study highlights the first known evaluation of the SNT SKR 2000, a scent transfer unit for non‐contact sampling of VOCs associated with C‐4. The STU unit, along with headspace‐ solid phase microextraction (HS‐SPME) and gas chromatography‐ mass spectrometry (GC–MS), was evaluated to collect 2,3‐dimethyl‐2,3‐dinitrobutane (DMNB), cyclohexanone, and 2‐ethyl‐1‐hexanol from C‐4. Additionally, 1‐BO was sampled under identical conditions to provide a simple, non‐energetic reference. The sampling parameters comprising of flow rate and sampling time were optimized and it was observed that a low flow rate coupled with a sampling time of 3 min yielded highest recovery of all three VOCS. The STU unit demonstrated reliable detection of VOCs from as little as 664 mg of C‐4. 1‐BO produced strong, reproducible signals that served as a practical check on sampling consistency. Compound‐specific behavior, along with sorption affinity to the sterile gauze pad as well as the SPME fiber, were the key factors responsible for the recovery of the analytes of interest. The STU unit was successful in recovering VOCs from both porous surfaces such as cardboard and non‐porous surfaces such as metal paint cans, with higher DMNB retention observed on porous substrates. 1‐BO was also recovered from both configurations, illustrating capture from a single‐odor environment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Forensic Sciences
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.70466
Primary Topic
Odor and Emission Control Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Performance evaluation of a scent transfer unit for sampling of explosives and their residues to investigate nuisance alerts

Himanshi Upadhyaya, John Goodpaster, Alexis Hecker
Journal of Forensic Sciences
Odor and Emission Control Technologies
article

Performance evaluation of a scent transfer unit for sampling of explosives and their residues to investigate nuisance alerts

Himanshi Upadhyaya, John Goodpaster, Alexis Hecker
article en

Abstract

Abstract Volatile organic compounds associated with explosives such as Composition C‐4 serve as important targets for canine training as well as field analysis. In parallel, 1‐bromooctane (1‐BO) is a benchmark to contextualize canine performance and aid interpretation of results. Improved understanding of the collection and recovery of these odorants is important for optimizing canine training aids, interpreting canine responses, and better understanding factors that may contribute to nuisance alerts. This study highlights the first known evaluation of the SNT SKR 2000, a scent transfer unit for non‐contact sampling of VOCs associated with C‐4. The STU unit, along with headspace‐ solid phase microextraction (HS‐SPME) and gas chromatography‐ mass spectrometry (GC–MS), was evaluated to collect 2,3‐dimethyl‐2,3‐dinitrobutane (DMNB), cyclohexanone, and 2‐ethyl‐1‐hexanol from C‐4. Additionally, 1‐BO was sampled under identical conditions to provide a simple, non‐energetic reference. The sampling parameters comprising of flow rate and sampling time were optimized and it was observed that a low flow rate coupled with a sampling time of 3 min yielded highest recovery of all three VOCS. The STU unit demonstrated reliable detection of VOCs from as little as 664 mg of C‐4. 1‐BO produced strong, reproducible signals that served as a practical check on sampling consistency. Compound‐specific behavior, along with sorption affinity to the sterile gauze pad as well as the SPME fiber, were the key factors responsible for the recovery of the analytes of interest. The STU unit was successful in recovering VOCs from both porous surfaces such as cardboard and non‐porous surfaces such as metal paint cans, with higher DMNB retention observed on porous substrates. 1‐BO was also recovered from both configurations, illustrating capture from a single‐odor environment.

Journal of Forensic Sciences
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Odor and Emission Control Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.