Impact of non-enteric-coated pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (NEPERT) on pain in patients with chronic pancreatitis: a double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, randomised trial

Background Pain in chronic pancreatitis (CP) is multifactorial. Efficacy of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) for pain remains uncertain. Objective To assess the effect of non-enteric-coated PERT (NEPERT) on pain in CP. Design In this 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial, we enrolled adults aged 18–60 years with CP (Mayo Clinic criteria) and chronic abdominal pain at two academic centres. Participants were randomised to NEPERT (protease 30 000U, lipase 25 000U, amylase 8000U per capsule) or placebo for 12 weeks. Outcomes were measured at 12 and 24 weeks. Primary outcome was between-group differences in change in Izbicki pain score from baseline to 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes were Izbicki and Visual Analogue Scale (for pain) at 24 weeks, painful days, analgesic/hospitalisation requirements, patient’s global impression of change and quality of life at 12 and 24 weeks. The reason for secondary outcomes assessment at 24 weeks was to evaluate carry-over effects after NEPERT. Primary analysis used repeated-measures mixed-effects models. Results 107 patients (mean (SD) age 34.4 (11.4) years; 71% men; 66% idiopathic) were randomised (53 placebo; 54 NEPERT). On intention-to-treat analysis, there were no significant between-group differences in pain improvement at 12 weeks (Izbicki −2.5 (95% CI −9.3 to 4.2), p=0.49). Findings were similar at 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes were also similar at 12 and 24 weeks, except for a higher proportion of participants reporting painful days at 12 weeks in the NEPERT group (mean group differences (95% CI) of −14.5 (−26.0 to −3.0); p=0.02). Adverse events were mild, self-limiting and comparable between groups. Conclusions In adults with painful CP, NEPERT did not improve pain compared with placebo. Trial registration number NCT05042284 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gut
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2026-338802
Primary Topic
Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Impact of non-enteric-coated pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (NEPERT) on pain in patients with chronic pancreatitis: a double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, randomised trial

Rajesh Goud, Misbah Unnisa, Rupjyoti Talukdar, Manu Tandan et al.
Gut
Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
article

Impact of non-enteric-coated pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (NEPERT) on pain in patients with chronic pancreatitis: a double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, randomised trial

Rajesh Goud, Misbah Unnisa, Rupjyoti Talukdar, Manu Tandan, Jahangeer Basha, Chandan Peddapulla, Nageshwar Duvvur Reddy, Manohar Reddy, Abdul Rasheed, Chandana Vuyyala
article en

Abstract

Background Pain in chronic pancreatitis (CP) is multifactorial. Efficacy of pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (PERT) for pain remains uncertain. Objective To assess the effect of non-enteric-coated PERT (NEPERT) on pain in CP. Design In this 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial, we enrolled adults aged 18–60 years with CP (Mayo Clinic criteria) and chronic abdominal pain at two academic centres. Participants were randomised to NEPERT (protease 30 000U, lipase 25 000U, amylase 8000U per capsule) or placebo for 12 weeks. Outcomes were measured at 12 and 24 weeks. Primary outcome was between-group differences in change in Izbicki pain score from baseline to 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes were Izbicki and Visual Analogue Scale (for pain) at 24 weeks, painful days, analgesic/hospitalisation requirements, patient’s global impression of change and quality of life at 12 and 24 weeks. The reason for secondary outcomes assessment at 24 weeks was to evaluate carry-over effects after NEPERT. Primary analysis used repeated-measures mixed-effects models. Results 107 patients (mean (SD) age 34.4 (11.4) years; 71% men; 66% idiopathic) were randomised (53 placebo; 54 NEPERT). On intention-to-treat analysis, there were no significant between-group differences in pain improvement at 12 weeks (Izbicki −2.5 (95% CI −9.3 to 4.2), p=0.49). Findings were similar at 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes were also similar at 12 and 24 weeks, except for a higher proportion of participants reporting painful days at 12 weeks in the NEPERT group (mean group differences (95% CI) of −14.5 (−26.0 to −3.0); p=0.02). Adverse events were mild, self-limiting and comparable between groups. Conclusions In adults with painful CP, NEPERT did not improve pain compared with placebo. Trial registration number NCT05042284 .

Gut
Asian Institute of Gastroenterology (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.