Stroke–heart syndrome outcomes in pre-existing vs. new-onset dementia: a report from a global federated research network

Abstract The prognostic significance of dementia onset in patients with stroke–heart syndrome (SHS) remains uncertain. We compared clinical outcomes between patients with pre-existing and new-onset dementia after ischemic stroke complicated by SHS. This retrospective cohort study used the TriNetX Global Collaborative Network, comprising de-identified electronic health records from more than 130 healthcare organizations between 2000 and 2024. Adults with ischemic stroke and subsequent SHS, defined as acute cardiac complications within 30 days after stroke, were identified and categorized as having pre-existing or new-onset dementia. Propensity score matching was used to balance demographics, comorbidities, and baseline treatments. Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals. We identified 7,667 patients with pre-existing dementia and 22,375 with new-onset dementia. After matching, 7,667 pairs were analyzed. Compared with pre-existing dementia, new-onset dementia was associated with a higher 1-year risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; HR 1.13, 95% confidence interval 1.07–1.19). This excess risk was mainly reflected by recurrent stroke (HR 1.50, 95% CI 1.31–1.72) and heart failure (HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.23–1.47) among MACE components, while atrial fibrillation was also increased as a secondary outcome (HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.25–1.48). Findings were consistent at 2- and 3-year follow-up, among patients with first-ever stroke, and after further adjustment for NIHSS, thrombolysis, and post-stroke rehabilitation. Among patients with SHS, new-onset dementia was associated with higher cardiovascular risk than pre-existing dementia, supporting closer brain–heart–cognition monitoring after stroke. Graphical abstract Dementia timing and 1-year cardiovascular outcomes after stroke–heart syndrome. This retrospective TriNetX cohort study included 30,042 adults with ischemic stroke and stroke–heart syndrome (SHS), classified as having new-onset or pre-existing dementia. After 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM), 7,667 pairs were followed from day 30 after stroke. Compared with pre-existing dementia, new-onset dementia was associated with higher 1-year risks of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), recurrent stroke, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation, highlighting a higher-risk brain–heart–cognition phenotype after SHS.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-026-03389-y
Primary Topic
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Stroke–heart syndrome outcomes in pre-existing vs. new-onset dementia: a report from a global federated research network

Akash Mavilakandy, Amir Askarinejad, Kang‐Yin Chen, Steven H. M. Lam et al.
Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
article

Stroke–heart syndrome outcomes in pre-existing vs. new-onset dementia: a report from a global federated research network

Akash Mavilakandy, Amir Askarinejad, Kang‐Yin Chen, Steven H. M. Lam, T S Gu, Gregory Y. H. Lip, Yang Chen, Tong Liu, Riccardo Proietti
article en

Abstract

Abstract The prognostic significance of dementia onset in patients with stroke–heart syndrome (SHS) remains uncertain. We compared clinical outcomes between patients with pre-existing and new-onset dementia after ischemic stroke complicated by SHS. This retrospective cohort study used the TriNetX Global Collaborative Network, comprising de-identified electronic health records from more than 130 healthcare organizations between 2000 and 2024. Adults with ischemic stroke and subsequent SHS, defined as acute cardiac complications within 30 days after stroke, were identified and categorized as having pre-existing or new-onset dementia. Propensity score matching was used to balance demographics, comorbidities, and baseline treatments. Cox proportional hazards models estimated hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals. We identified 7,667 patients with pre-existing dementia and 22,375 with new-onset dementia. After matching, 7,667 pairs were analyzed. Compared with pre-existing dementia, new-onset dementia was associated with a higher 1-year risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; HR 1.13, 95% confidence interval 1.07–1.19). This excess risk was mainly reflected by recurrent stroke (HR 1.50, 95% CI 1.31–1.72) and heart failure (HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.23–1.47) among MACE components, while atrial fibrillation was also increased as a secondary outcome (HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.25–1.48). Findings were consistent at 2- and 3-year follow-up, among patients with first-ever stroke, and after further adjustment for NIHSS, thrombolysis, and post-stroke rehabilitation. Among patients with SHS, new-onset dementia was associated with higher cardiovascular risk than pre-existing dementia, supporting closer brain–heart–cognition monitoring after stroke. Graphical abstract Dementia timing and 1-year cardiovascular outcomes after stroke–heart syndrome. This retrospective TriNetX cohort study included 30,042 adults with ischemic stroke and stroke–heart syndrome (SHS), classified as having new-onset or pre-existing dementia. After 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM), 7,667 pairs were followed from day 30 after stroke. Compared with pre-existing dementia, new-onset dementia was associated with higher 1-year risks of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), recurrent stroke, heart failure, and atrial fibrillation, highlighting a higher-risk brain–heart–cognition phenotype after SHS.

Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.