Gut microbiome signatures of colorectal cancer development are more pronounced in women compared to men in a population-based screening cohort

Abstract Background The gut microbiome has emerged as a promising source of biomarkers to enhance early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, sex-specific differences in gut microbial profiles and their relationship to CRC risk remain underexplored. Our objective was to investigate sex-specific differences in gut microbial profiles of a CRC-screening population, as well as the potential for sex-specific associations between the gut microbiome and colorectal lesions. Methods This cross-sectional study included 1,034 faecal immunochemical test-positive screening participants aged 55–77 years recruited from the Norwegian CRCbiome study. Shotgun metagenomic sequencing was used to generate taxonomic and functional profiles of the gut microbiome, which were integrated with clinicopathological, demographic, and lifestyle data. Associations between sex, colorectal lesions, and microbial characteristics - including α-diversity, β-diversity, and abundances of bacterial species and functions - were assessed, including their interactions. Results Male participants had significantly higher odds of presenting with both non-advanced (OR: 1.50; 95% CI: 1.00-2.26) and advanced (OR: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.10–1.93) colorectal lesions compared to women. Gut microbial profiles differed markedly by sex, demonstrating compositional shifts and distinct bacterial profiles (13 bacteria and 41 functions more abundant in women, 19 taxa and 58 functions more abundant in men). In women, microbial α- and β-diversity varied across lesion subtypes, whereas no such differences were observed in men. Interaction analyses identified five bacteria and nine functions that were differentially associated with colorectal lesions by sex. Known CRC-associated bacteria showed broadly similar profiles in women and men, however, pks -positive Escherichia coli was associated with CRC in women only. Conclusion This study demonstrates pronounced sex differences in gut microbial profiles and suggests that some microbiome–lesion associations may differ between women and men. These results underscore the importance of considering sex in future microbiome-based CRC research and prevention efforts. Trial Registration The BCSN is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (National clinical trial (NCT) no. 01538550).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Biology of Sex Differences
Published
2026-09-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13293-026-00985-8
Primary Topic
Gut microbiota and health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Gut microbiome signatures of colorectal cancer development are more pronounced in women compared to men in a population-based screening cohort

Cecilie Bucher-Johannessen, Kristin Ranheim Randel, Vahid Bemanian, Paula Berstad et al.
Biology of Sex Differences
Gut microbiota and health
article

Gut microbiome signatures of colorectal cancer development are more pronounced in women compared to men in a population-based screening cohort

Cecilie Bucher-Johannessen, Kristin Ranheim Randel, Vahid Bemanian, Paula Berstad, Trine B. Rounge, Ekaterina Avershina, Ane Sørlie Kværner, Geir Hoff, Einar Birkeland, Eivind Hovig, Edoardo Botteri
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The gut microbiome has emerged as a promising source of biomarkers to enhance early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, sex-specific differences in gut microbial profiles and their relationship to CRC risk remain underexplored. Our objective was to investigate sex-specific differences in gut microbial profiles of a CRC-screening population, as well as the potential for sex-specific associations between the gut microbiome and colorectal lesions. Methods This cross-sectional study included 1,034 faecal immunochemical test-positive screening participants aged 55–77 years recruited from the Norwegian CRCbiome study. Shotgun metagenomic sequencing was used to generate taxonomic and functional profiles of the gut microbiome, which were integrated with clinicopathological, demographic, and lifestyle data. Associations between sex, colorectal lesions, and microbial characteristics - including α-diversity, β-diversity, and abundances of bacterial species and functions - were assessed, including their interactions. Results Male participants had significantly higher odds of presenting with both non-advanced (OR: 1.50; 95% CI: 1.00-2.26) and advanced (OR: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.10–1.93) colorectal lesions compared to women. Gut microbial profiles differed markedly by sex, demonstrating compositional shifts and distinct bacterial profiles (13 bacteria and 41 functions more abundant in women, 19 taxa and 58 functions more abundant in men). In women, microbial α- and β-diversity varied across lesion subtypes, whereas no such differences were observed in men. Interaction analyses identified five bacteria and nine functions that were differentially associated with colorectal lesions by sex. Known CRC-associated bacteria showed broadly similar profiles in women and men, however, pks -positive Escherichia coli was associated with CRC in women only. Conclusion This study demonstrates pronounced sex differences in gut microbial profiles and suggests that some microbiome–lesion associations may differ between women and men. These results underscore the importance of considering sex in future microbiome-based CRC research and prevention efforts. Trial Registration The BCSN is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (National clinical trial (NCT) no. 01538550).

Biology of Sex Differences
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Gut microbiota and health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.