Design and sterilization of 3D-printed glass-bottomed multiwells for cell culture and immunostaining

Abstract 3D printers are increasingly found in wet laboratories, allowing researchers to print devices for their research needs. To make those devices suitable for cell culture, they should ideally be sterilized following protocols used in cell biology labs. Simultaneously, any sterilization protocol should maintain the mechanical stability of the printed device. Here we have studied two 3D printing materials, Poly-Lactic Acid (PLA) polymers and Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS)-like Photopolymer resins, which are prevalently used in 3D printing. We have subjected 3D-printed specimens of each material to UV light exposure, ethanol immersion and autoclaving, and have verified their mechanical stability at the macro- and nanoscales using tensile testing and nanoindentation. ABS-like resin (0.31 ± 0.07 GPa) remained mechanically viable after UV illumination (1.19 ± 0.02 GPa) or autoclaving (0.36 ± 0.05 GPa), but deteriorated when submerged in ethanol (0.01 ± 0.00 GPa). Nevertheless, sterilized ABS-printed devices probed to be toxic to cells, an effect that could not be prevented when switching to the inert Formlabs Grey resin. On the other hand, PLA specimens (1.22 ± 0.09 GPa) remained mechanically viable after ethanol (1.23 ± 0.15 GPa) and UV (1.21 ± 0.01 GPa) challenge but deteriorated in the autoclave (0.75 ± 0.20 GPa). This effect was prevented when switching to Heat-Treated PLA (HTPLA) polymers (1.07 ± 0.13 GPa). Sterilization of HTPLA-printed devices with a sequence of autoclave, ethanol and UV treatments deemed them suitable for long-term cell culture, as confirmed by measuring cell morphologies and doubling times (21.06 ± 4.66 h). Altogether, we provide here designs for in-house 3D-printing and assembly of glass-bottomed multiwells based on HTPLA and detail optimal sterilization protocols for their use in long-term cell culture and immunostaining. Key points • 3D printers can be used to create reusable culture devices • 3D-printed materials can be sterilized to be used as culture vessels • Standard sterilization already used in the lab can be used with 3D-printed materials

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-026-14032-4
Primary Topic
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Design and sterilization of 3D-printed glass-bottomed multiwells for cell culture and immunostaining

E. Xuriguera, José Antonio Padilla, Sergio Noé, Núria Gavara et al.
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
article

Design and sterilization of 3D-printed glass-bottomed multiwells for cell culture and immunostaining

E. Xuriguera, José Antonio Padilla, Sergio Noé, Núria Gavara, E. Jiménez‐Piqué, Irene Buj-Corral, Ignasi Jorba, Héctor Sanz-Fraile, Francesc Barberà Flichi
article en

Abstract

Abstract 3D printers are increasingly found in wet laboratories, allowing researchers to print devices for their research needs. To make those devices suitable for cell culture, they should ideally be sterilized following protocols used in cell biology labs. Simultaneously, any sterilization protocol should maintain the mechanical stability of the printed device. Here we have studied two 3D printing materials, Poly-Lactic Acid (PLA) polymers and Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS)-like Photopolymer resins, which are prevalently used in 3D printing. We have subjected 3D-printed specimens of each material to UV light exposure, ethanol immersion and autoclaving, and have verified their mechanical stability at the macro- and nanoscales using tensile testing and nanoindentation. ABS-like resin (0.31 ± 0.07 GPa) remained mechanically viable after UV illumination (1.19 ± 0.02 GPa) or autoclaving (0.36 ± 0.05 GPa), but deteriorated when submerged in ethanol (0.01 ± 0.00 GPa). Nevertheless, sterilized ABS-printed devices probed to be toxic to cells, an effect that could not be prevented when switching to the inert Formlabs Grey resin. On the other hand, PLA specimens (1.22 ± 0.09 GPa) remained mechanically viable after ethanol (1.23 ± 0.15 GPa) and UV (1.21 ± 0.01 GPa) challenge but deteriorated in the autoclave (0.75 ± 0.20 GPa). This effect was prevented when switching to Heat-Treated PLA (HTPLA) polymers (1.07 ± 0.13 GPa). Sterilization of HTPLA-printed devices with a sequence of autoclave, ethanol and UV treatments deemed them suitable for long-term cell culture, as confirmed by measuring cell morphologies and doubling times (21.06 ± 4.66 h). Altogether, we provide here designs for in-house 3D-printing and assembly of glass-bottomed multiwells based on HTPLA and detail optimal sterilization protocols for their use in long-term cell culture and immunostaining. Key points • 3D printers can be used to create reusable culture devices • 3D-printed materials can be sterilized to be used as culture vessels • Standard sterilization already used in the lab can be used with 3D-printed materials

Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.