Securitising online dissent: Digital repression and social media control in Pakistan

The article examines how securitisation operates in an authoritarian regime through top-down institutional power and traces the transformation of online dissent into a security threat in Pakistan. As the political struggle increasingly shifts to social media platforms, states are developing new mechanisms to regulate and suppress online dissent. In Pakistan, concerns over national security, misinformation, fake news and cybercrimes are increasingly invoked to justify restrictions on online freedom of expression. These practices are often discussed in the context of digital authoritarianism, while less attention has been paid to security discourse as a mechanism of controlling online dissent. This study addresses this gap by integrating securitisation theory with the scholarship on digital authoritarianism to analyse how online dissent is securitised in Pakistan. The study employs a qualitative case-study design based on discourse analysis of official speeches, legal amendments and human rights reports produced between 2022 and 2026. The study contributes to theoretical scholarship on securitisation by analysing how securitisation functions in authoritarian regimes where institutional authority can substitute for audience persuasion emphasised in classical securitisation theory. Empirically, the study highlights the implications of the securitisation of online dissent on freedom of expression and the future of digital governance in Pakistan and beyond.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Change Peace & Security
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2026.2723613
Primary Topic
Global Security and Public Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Securitising online dissent: Digital repression and social media control in Pakistan

Christian Kaunert, Alamgir Khan, Mirza Hussain
Global Change Peace & Security
Global Security and Public Health
article

Securitising online dissent: Digital repression and social media control in Pakistan

Christian Kaunert, Alamgir Khan, Mirza Hussain
article en

Abstract

The article examines how securitisation operates in an authoritarian regime through top-down institutional power and traces the transformation of online dissent into a security threat in Pakistan. As the political struggle increasingly shifts to social media platforms, states are developing new mechanisms to regulate and suppress online dissent. In Pakistan, concerns over national security, misinformation, fake news and cybercrimes are increasingly invoked to justify restrictions on online freedom of expression. These practices are often discussed in the context of digital authoritarianism, while less attention has been paid to security discourse as a mechanism of controlling online dissent. This study addresses this gap by integrating securitisation theory with the scholarship on digital authoritarianism to analyse how online dissent is securitised in Pakistan. The study employs a qualitative case-study design based on discourse analysis of official speeches, legal amendments and human rights reports produced between 2022 and 2026. The study contributes to theoretical scholarship on securitisation by analysing how securitisation functions in authoritarian regimes where institutional authority can substitute for audience persuasion emphasised in classical securitisation theory. Empirically, the study highlights the implications of the securitisation of online dissent on freedom of expression and the future of digital governance in Pakistan and beyond.

Global Change Peace & Security
University of South Wales (GB), Dublin City University (IE), National Defence University (PK)
European Commission, Grantová Agentura České Republiky
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Global Security and Public Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Securitising online dissent: Digital repression and social media control in Pakistan — Christian Kaunert, Alamgir Khan, et al. · Global Change Peace & Security (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS