The Circular Reasoning in the Superluminal Ban: A Logical Note on the Einstein Synchronization Convention

The standard argument holds that superluminal signals would allow the construction of closed timelike curves (CTCs), leading to causal paradoxes, and therefore superluminal signaling is impossible. This note points out that this argument is operationally circular. The coordinate time t' in the Lorentz transformation is based on Einstein's synchronization convention, which presupposes the isotropy of light. This note does not claim that superluminal signals exist, nor that relativity is wrong. It only points out that in inferences with v>c, the use of global simultaneity exceeds the scope of its operational definition. This is a logical note, not a refutation. It provides a bug-fix for the textbook antitelephone argument and proposes TCLM t_trunk as a possible repair direction. Full derivation with V=0.8c, v=2c is included. Chinese Title: 超光速禁令中的循環論證:一個關於愛因斯坦同步約定的邏輯注記

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22782048
Primary Topic
Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
preprint

The Circular Reasoning in the Superluminal Ban: A Logical Note on the Einstein Synchronization Convention

Lee, Wang Hin (李泓軒, Elfin)
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Relativity and Gravitational Theory
preprint

The Circular Reasoning in the Superluminal Ban: A Logical Note on the Einstein Synchronization Convention

Lee, Wang Hin (李泓軒, Elfin)
preprint en

Abstract

The standard argument holds that superluminal signals would allow the construction of closed timelike curves (CTCs), leading to causal paradoxes, and therefore superluminal signaling is impossible. This note points out that this argument is operationally circular. The coordinate time t' in the Lorentz transformation is based on Einstein's synchronization convention, which presupposes the isotropy of light. This note does not claim that superluminal signals exist, nor that relativity is wrong. It only points out that in inferences with v>c, the use of global simultaneity exceeds the scope of its operational definition. This is a logical note, not a refutation. It provides a bug-fix for the textbook antitelephone argument and proposes TCLM t_trunk as a possible repair direction. Full derivation with V=0.8c, v=2c is included. Chinese Title: 超光速禁令中的循環論證:一個關於愛因斯坦同步約定的邏輯注記

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Relativity and Gravitational Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.