The director as boundary spanner

This article uses the concept of the boundary spanner to examine the ways in which theatre directors literally and metaphorically translate material originally produced in different linguistic and cultural contexts. It does so with specific reference to Peter Brook’s work in the 1940s and 1950s, when he specialized in producing French plays in London. It argues that Brook was both an astute commentator of the differences between the French and British scenes, and an effective theatre maker with a characteristic approach to making performable material resisted by newspaper critics. The article uses artefacts housed in the Victoria and Albert Museum’s Theatre and Performance Collections, and, in particular, in the Peter Brook Collection, to reveal how the director theatrically translated plays by Anouilh, Cocteau, Roussin and Sartre in order to describe and comment on the practices of theatrical boundary spanning. This article was published open access under a CC BY-ND licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Romance Studies
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3828/jrs.2026.13
Primary Topic
Theatre and Performance Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The director as boundary spanner

Dominic Glynn
Journal of Romance Studies
Theatre and Performance Studies
article

The director as boundary spanner

Dominic Glynn
article en

Abstract

This article uses the concept of the boundary spanner to examine the ways in which theatre directors literally and metaphorically translate material originally produced in different linguistic and cultural contexts. It does so with specific reference to Peter Brook’s work in the 1940s and 1950s, when he specialized in producing French plays in London. It argues that Brook was both an astute commentator of the differences between the French and British scenes, and an effective theatre maker with a characteristic approach to making performable material resisted by newspaper critics. The article uses artefacts housed in the Victoria and Albert Museum’s Theatre and Performance Collections, and, in particular, in the Peter Brook Collection, to reveal how the director theatrically translated plays by Anouilh, Cocteau, Roussin and Sartre in order to describe and comment on the practices of theatrical boundary spanning. This article was published open access under a CC BY-ND licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ .

Journal of Romance StudiesVol. 26(3)
Université Paris-Saclay (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Theatre and Performance Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The director as boundary spanner — Dominic Glynn · Journal of Romance Studies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS