Color–concept associations reveal a new conceptual space

People are capable of using simple perceptual features such as color to signify complex meanings (perceptual semantics), an important aspect of nonverbal communication. This paper considers the nature and structure of the mental representations that support these abilities, using color semantics as a key example. Prior work has shown that people can judge the strength of association between essentially any color and any concept. Across four experiments we show that such associations express a low-rank conceptual space, color semantic space, whose dimensions can be well-characterized using color space regression. The color semantic space is distinct from classical connotative (affective) and denotative (literal) semantic spaces and from perceptual color space. Further, color semantic relations help to predict human judgments of word-meaning similarity across a diverse set of concepts—even when such judgments are not explicitly about color. The methodology we develop is general, offering a means of evaluating the mental structures underlying other aspects of nonverbal communication. Together, the work suggests that color–concept associations are encoded within a previously unrecognized conceptual representation space, and opens the possibility that human thought may rely on multiple different kinds of conceptual spaces—with implications both for cognitive science generally and for understanding the use of color in domains such as visual communication.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2026-09-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2526862123
Primary Topic
Categorization, perception, and language
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Color–concept associations reveal a new conceptual space

Laurent Lessard, Timothy T. Rogers, Karen B. Schloss, Kushin Mukherjee et al.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Categorization, perception, and language
article

Color–concept associations reveal a new conceptual space

Laurent Lessard, Timothy T. Rogers, Karen B. Schloss, Kushin Mukherjee, Michael Gleicher
article en

Abstract

People are capable of using simple perceptual features such as color to signify complex meanings (perceptual semantics), an important aspect of nonverbal communication. This paper considers the nature and structure of the mental representations that support these abilities, using color semantics as a key example. Prior work has shown that people can judge the strength of association between essentially any color and any concept. Across four experiments we show that such associations express a low-rank conceptual space, color semantic space, whose dimensions can be well-characterized using color space regression. The color semantic space is distinct from classical connotative (affective) and denotative (literal) semantic spaces and from perceptual color space. Further, color semantic relations help to predict human judgments of word-meaning similarity across a diverse set of concepts—even when such judgments are not explicitly about color. The methodology we develop is general, offering a means of evaluating the mental structures underlying other aspects of nonverbal communication. Together, the work suggests that color–concept associations are encoded within a previously unrecognized conceptual representation space, and opens the possibility that human thought may rely on multiple different kinds of conceptual spaces—with implications both for cognitive science generally and for understanding the use of color in domains such as visual communication.

Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesVol. 123(38)
Northeastern University (US), University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Wisconsin Institutes for Discovery (US), University College London (GB), Stanford University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Categorization, perception, and language
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.